19:0258(35)AR - Army Aberdeen Proving Ground and Local 2424, IAM -- 1985 FLRAdec AR
[ v19 p258 ]
19:0258(35)AR
The decision of the Authority follows:
19 FLRA No. 35 U.S. ARMY ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND Activity and LOCAL 2424, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS, AFL-CIO Union Case No. O-AR-721 DECISION This matter is before the Authority on an exception to the award of Arbitrator James P. Whyte filed by the Department of the Army (the Agency) under section 7122(a) of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute and part 2425 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations. The grievance alleged that the Activity failed to distribute overtime duties "equally" in accordance with the parties' collective bargaining agreement. The Arbitrator determined that the Activity had violated the agreement by failing to equitably distribute and properly record overtime. The Arbitrator concluded that although the record before him did not "provide a valid basis for individual monetary awards," the violation of the agreement justified an award of "nominal damages" to each grievant. Accordingly, as his award, the Arbitrator awarded eight hours of overtime pay to each of the grievants. In its exception, the Agency contends that the award violates the Back Pay Act, 5 U.S.C. 5596 because the Arbitrator did not find that but for the violation of the agreement each of the grievants would have worked eight hours of overtime. The Authority agrees. The Authority has consistently stated that the Back Pay Act requires not only a determination that the aggrieved employee was affected by an unjustified or unwarranted personnel action, but also a determination that such unwarranted action directly resulted in the withdrawal or reduction in the pay, allowances, or differentials that the employee otherwise would have earned or received. Thus, in order for an award of backpay by an arbitrator to be authorized by the Act, the arbitrator must find that an agency personnel action with respect to the grievant was unjustified or unwarranted, that such unjustified or unwarranted personnel action directly resulted in the withdrawal or reduction of the grievant's pay, allowances, or differentials, and that but for such action, the grievant otherwise would not have suffered such withdrawal or reduction of pay, allowances, or differentials. E.g., Jefferson Barracks National Cemetery, St. Louis, Missouri and National Association of Government Employees, Local R14-116, 13 FLRA 703 (1984). In terms of this case, although the Arbitrator determined that the Activity violated the parties' agreement, he failed to make the finding necessary for an authorized award of backpay. Specifically, he failed to find that but for the Activity's violation of the agreement, each of the grievants would have worked and been paid for eight hours of overtime. The Arbitrator's finding that the grievants should be awarded "nominal damages" clearly does not constitute the requisite finding and, moreover, as indicated above, the Arbitrator concluded that there was not a valid basis in the record before him for making the necessary determination. Consequently, the award of overtime pay to the grievants is contrary to the Back Pay Act and is set aside. Issued, Washington, D.C., July 25, 1985 Henry B. Frazier III, Acting Chairman William J. McGinnis, Jr., Member FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY