American Federation of Government Employees, Local 3403, AFL-CIO (Union) and National Science Foundation, Washington, DC (Agency)
[ v04 p575 ]
04:0575(77)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
4 FLRA No. 77 AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 3403 Union and NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION, WASHINGTON, D.C. Agency Case No. 0-NG-243 DECISION AND ORDER ON NEGOTIABILITY APPEAL THIS CASE COMES BEFORE THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY (THE AUTHORITY) PURSUANT TO SECTION 7105(A)(2)(E) OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE (THE STATUTE) (5 U.S.C. 7101 ET SEQ.). ON NOVEMBER 13, 1979, THE AGENCY FORWARDED A PROPOSED REVISION TO ITS REDUCTION-IN-FORCE REGULATION, NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION (NSF) CIRCULAR NO. 33, TO THE UNION FOR REVIEW. ACCORDING TO THE AGENCY, THE PROPOSED REVISION WAS DESIGNED ONLY TO BRING NSF CIRCULAR NO. 33 IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF HIGHER AUTHORITY, SUCH AS THE CIVIL SERVICE REFORM ACT OF 1978 AND THE REGULATIONS OF THE OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT. IN RESPONSE, THE UNION SUBMITTED A PROPOSAL, CONTAINING A SERIES OF ITS OWN DESIRED REVISIONS TO NSF CIRCULAR NO. 33, WHICH IT SOUGHT TO NEGOTIATE. THE AGENCY TOOK THE POSITION THAT THE DUTY TO BARGAIN DID NOT EXTEND TO THE MATTERS INVOLVED IN THE UNION'S PROPOSAL, STATING THAT "(T)HE PROPOSAL DOES NOT RELATE TO THE MATTERS MANDATED BY HIGHER AUTHORITY WHICH ARE THE BASIS FOR THE PROPOSED REVISION, BUT RATHER IT REPRESENTS AN ATTEMPT TO INITIATE MIDCONTRACT CHANGES IN ESTABLISHED PERSONNEL POLICIES, PRACTICES AND MATTERS AFFECTING WORKING CONDITIONS." IN ITS APPEAL, THE UNION CONTENDS THE PROPOSAL CONCERNS WORKING CONDITIONS OF UNIT EMPLOYEES. THE UNION ARGUES FURTHER THAT THERE IS NO PROVISION IN THE STATUTE "LIMITING THE RIGHT TO BARGAIN DURING THE TERM OF A CONTRACT," AND IN THIS CASE, "THERE IS NO CONTRACTUAL WAIVER OF THE RIGHT TO BARGAIN." IN ITS STATEMENT OF POSITION, THE AGENCY ARGUES THAT THE PROPOSED REVISION TO NSF CIRCULAR NO. 33 IMPLEMENTS STATUTORY PROVISIONS AND REGULATORY PROVISIONS OF THE OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT AND THEREFORE NO OBLIGATION TO BARGAIN EXISTS WITH RESPECT TO THE REVISION OTHER THAN MATTERS RELATING TO ITS IMPACT AND IMPLEMENTATION. IN SUPPORT OF THIS ARGUMENT, THE AGENCY RELIES ON NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION AND AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 3403, AFL-CIO, 1 FLRA NO. 116(1979). IN THAT DECISION, WHICH INVOLVED THE SAME PARTIES AND THE SAME COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT AS IN THIS CASE, THE AUTHORITY DETERMINED THAT NSF CIRCULAR NO. 33 HAD BEEN INCORPORATED AS A TERM OF THE PARTIES' COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT AND THE AGENCY WAS OBLIGATED TO BARGAIN OVER THE IMPACT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO CIRCULAR NO. 33. SINCE THE AGENCY ASSERTS THAT THE UNION'S PROPOSAL BEARS NO RELATION TO THE CHANGES IN CIRCULAR NO. 33 PROPOSED BY THE AGENCY, AND SINCE THE AGENCY ASSERTS THERE IS NO PROVISION IN THE PARTIES' COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT THAT REQUIRES BARGAINING OVER THE PORTIONS OF CIRCULAR NO. 33 WHICH WILL REMAIN UNALTERED, THE AGENCY MAINTAINS THERE IS NO OBLIGATION UNDER THE STATUTE TO BARGAIN OVER THE UNION'S PROPOSAL. THUS, IT APPEARS THAT THE PRINCIPAL DISPUTE BETWEEN THE PARTIES CONCERNS THE NATURE OF THE UNDERLYING OBLIGATION TO BARGAIN, NOT WHETHER THE PROPOSALS THEMSELVES ARE NEGOTIABLE. QUESTIONS CONCERNING WHETHER THE AGENCY IS OBLIGATED TO BARGAIN AT THIS TIME ON THE MATTERS RAISED BY THE UNION DO NOT FOCUS ON ISSUES APPROPRIATE FOR RESOLUTION UNDER THE PROCEDURES SET FORTH IN SECTION 7117 OF THE STATUTE AND PART 2424 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS (5 CFR 2424.1 ET SEQ.), CONCERNING WHETHER A PARTICULAR UNION PROPOSAL IS ITSELF NONNEGOTIABLE, I.E., INCONSISTENT WITH LAW, RULE OR REGULATION. RATHER, THE SUBSTANCE OF THE PARTIES' CONTENTIONS CONCERNS UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE ISSUES APPROPRIATE FOR RESOLUTION UNDER PROCEDURES SET FORTH UNDER SECTION 7118 OF THE STATUTE. THAT IS, THE PROPER FORUM IN WHICH TO RAISE THESE ISSUES IS NOT A NEGOTIABILITY APPEAL, BUT WOULD BE AN UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE PROCEEDING PURSUANT TO SECTION 7118 OF THE STATUTE. IN THIS REGARD, RESOLUTION OF THE INSTANT DISPUTE MAY BE DEPENDENT UPON THE RESOLUTION OF FACTUAL ISSUES RELATED TO THE PARTIES' CONDUCT. SUCH FACTUAL DETERMINATIONS CAN BEST BE ACCOMPLISHED THROUGH USE OF INVESTIGATORY AND FORMAL HEARING PROCEDURES SET FORTH IN PART 2423 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS WHICH GOVERN UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE PROCEEDINGS (5 CFR 2423.1 ET SEQ.). SEE, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 1931 AND DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, NAVAL WEAPONS STATION, CONCORD, CALIFORNIA, 2 FLRA NO. 19(1979) AND NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION AND DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, U.S. CUSTOMS SERVICE, WASHINGTON, D.C., 3 FLRA NO. 52(1980). BASED ON THE FOREGOING, THIS NEGOTIABILITY APPEAL DOES NOT PRESENT ISSUES THAT THE AUTHORITY CAN APPROPRIATELY RESOLVE AT THIS TIME UNDER SECTION 7117 OF THE STATUTE AND PART 2424 OF ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED THAT THE UNION'S APPEAL BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO THE UNOIN'S RIGHT TO RESUBMIT TO THE AUTHORITY ANY NEGOTIABILITY DISPUTE WHICH REMAINS CONCERNING THE UNION'S PROPOSALS, AFTER RESORTING TO THE PROCEDURES DISCUSSED ABOVE. ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., NOVEMBER 12, 1980 RONALD W. HAUGHTON, CHAIRMAN HENRY B. FRAZIER III, MEMBER LEON B. APPLEWHAITE, MEMBER FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE COPIES OF THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY IN THE SUBJECT PROCEEDING HAVE THIS DAY BEEN MAILED TO THE PARTIES LISTED: MR. PHILLIP R. KETE LABOR RELATIONS CONSULTANT GAFFREY, ANSPACH, SCHEMBER, KLIMASKI, AND MARKS, P.C. 1712 N STREET, N.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20036 MR. THOMAS UBOIS ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FOR ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20550 HONORABLE RICHARD C. ATKINSON DIRECTOR NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20550