Louisiana Army National Guard, New Orleans, Louisiana, A/SLMR No. 1117

 



[ v01 p78 ]
01:0078(2)RO
The decision of the Authority follows:


 1 FLRA No. 2
                                            JANUARY 25, 1979
 
 CAPTAIN THOMAS K. KIRKPATRICK
 KIRKPATRICK, KEYSER AND KIRKPATRICK
 ATTORNEYS AT LAW
 5551 CORPORATE BOULEVARD, SUITE 2A
 BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA 70808
 
                             RE:  LOUISIANA ARMY NATIONAL GUARD, 
                                  NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA, A/SLMR 
                                  No. 1117, FLRC No. 78A-134
 
 DEAR CAPTAIN KIRKPATRICK:
 
    THIS REFERS TO YOUR PETITION FILED ON BEHALF OF THE LOUISIANA ARMY
 NATIONAL GUARD, SEEKING REVIEW OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY'S DECISION IN
 THE ABOVE-ENTITLED CASE.  FOR THE REASON INDICATED BELOW, THE AUTHORITY
 HAS DISMISSED YOUR PETITION FOR REVIEW.
 
    SECTION 2411.42 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES OF PROCEDURE (FORMERLY
 SECTION 2411.42 OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS
 COUNCIL, APPLICABLE HERE PURSUANT TO AND AS AMENDED BY SECTION 2400.2 OF
 THE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE AUTHORITY (COPY ENCLOSED) PROVIDES, AS
 HERE RELEVANT:
 
    SECTION 2411.42 APPROVAL OF SUBMISSION.
 
    . . . (T)HE AUTHORITY SHALL CONSIDER A PETITION FROM AN AGENCY . . .
 ONLY WHEN THE HEAD OF
 
    THE AGENCY (OR HIS DESIGNEE) . . . HAS APPROVED SUBMISSION OF THE
 PETITION.
 
    YOU WERE ORALLY INFORMED OF THAT PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENT.  HOWEVER, NO
 SUBMISSION HAS BEEN MADE IN COMPLIANCE THEREWITH.  ON THE CONTRARY, WE
 HAVE