U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE RURAL DEVELOPMENT TEMPLE, TEXAS RESPONDENT | Case No. DA-CA-15-0080 |
AND AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 571, AFL-CIO CHARGING PARTY |
Charlotte A. Dye
For the General Counsel
James A. Keim
For the Respondent
Paul D. Palacio
For the Union
Before: CHARLES R. CENTER
Chief Administrative Law Judge
DECISION AND ORDER REMANDING CASE
On December 4, 2014, the American Federation of Government Employees, Local 571, AFL-CIO (Union/
Local 571) filed an unfair labor practice charge against the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Rural Development, Temple, Texas (Respondent). On June 30, 2015, the Dallas Regional Director of the Federal Labor Relations Authority (Authority) issued a Complaint and Notice of Hearing, alleging that the Respondent violated § 7116(a)(1) and (5) of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (Statute) by implementing a change to bargaining unit employees’ conditions of employment without providing the Union with notice and an opportunity to bargain to the extent required by the Statute. On July 7, 2015, the Respondent filed its Answer to the Complaint.
A hearing was held on November 19, 2015, in Temple, Texas, where testimony was taken and documentary evidence introduced into the record. The General Counsel and Respondent timely filed post-hearing briefs.
On January 7, 2016, Counsel for the General Counsel filed a Motion to Remand Case to the Dallas Region, indicating that an informal settlement had been reached with the Respondent. The motion indicated that the Respondent did not oppose the motion, but the Union opposed the motion. Neither the Respondent or Union filed a response to the motion within the five days allotted by 5 C.F.R. § 2423.21(b)(3).
Absent an explanation for opposition, pursuant to § 2423.31(e)(1) of the Rules and Regulations of the Authority, I conclude that the withdrawal of the Complaint is appropriate in light of the uncontested assertions set forth in the motion to remand. Therefore, I find that remanding the case to the Regional Director for further action is appropriate.
ORDER
The General Counsel’s Motion to Remand Case is GRANTED. The case is hereby Remanded to the Regional Director for further action as he deems appropriate to effectuate the purposes and policies of the Statute.
Issued, Washington, D.C., January 21, 2016
_____________________________________
CHARLES R. CENTER
Chief Administrative Law Judge