[ v02 p348 ]
02:0348(45)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
2 FLRA No. 45 MR. RONALD D. KING, DIRECTOR CONTRACT AND APPEALS DIVISION AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO 1325 MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE, NW. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005 RE: AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 2703 AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, Case No. 0-NG-58 DEAR MR. KING: THIS REFERS TO THE PETITION FOR REVIEW OF A NEGOTIABILITY ISSUE IN THE ABOVE-ENTITLED CASE, FILED WITH THE AUTHORITY ON MAY 3, 1979, BY THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO(THE UNION). FOR THE REASONS INDICATED BELOW, IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT THE PETITION WAS UNTIMELY FILED AND CANNOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. SECTION 2424.3 OF THE AUTHORITY'S INTERIM RULES OF PROCEDURE (44 F.R. 44765), PERTAINING TO PETITIONS FOR REVIEW OF NEGOTIABILITY ISSUES, PROVIDES, IN PART: THE TIME LIMIT FOR FILING A PETITION FOR REVIEW IS FIFTEEN (15) DAYS AFTER THE DATE THE AGENCY'S ALLEGATION THAT THE DUTY TO BARGAIN IN GOOD FAITH DOES NOT EXTEND TO THE MATTER PROPOSED TO BE BARGAINED IS SERVED ON THE EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATIVE. THE AGENCY'S ALLEGATION THAT THE PROPOSAL AT ISSUE IN THIS CASE IS NONNEGOTIABLE IS DATED FEBRUARY 22, 1979, AND APPEARS, ABSENT ANY INDICATION IN THE RECORD TO THE CONTRARY, TO HAVE BEEN SERVED ON THE UNION ON THAT SAME DATE. THEREFORE, THE UNION'S PETITION FOR REVIEW, FILED WITH THE AUTHORITY ON MAY 3, 1979, MORE THAN 2 MONTHS AFTER THE DATE OF THE ALLEGATION, IS CLEARLY UNTIMELY. ACCORDINGLY, SINCE THE UNION'S APPEAL WAS UNTIMELY FILED WITH THE AUTHORITY, AND APART FROM OTHER CONSIDERATIONS, THE APPEAL IS HEREBY DISMISSED. FOR THE AUTHORITY. SINCERELY, SAMUEL A. CHAITOVITZ EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR CC: J. C. BROWN COMMERCE