[ v01 p1043 ]
01:1043(117)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
1 FLRA No. 117 SEPTEMBER 24, 1979 MR. WILLIAM H. SHOATS NATIONAL REPRESENTATIVE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO 1890 PACIFIC AVENUE LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90806 RE: AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 1978 AND DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, BOULDER CITY, NEVADA, Case No. 0-NG-7 DEAR MR. SHOATS: THIS REFERS TO YOUR PETITION FOR REVIEW AND THE AGENCY'S STATEMENT IN RESPONSE THERETO, FILED WITH THE AUTHORITY IN THE ABOVE-ENTITLED CASE. BY AUTHORITY LETTER OF MARCH 7, 1979, YOU WERE ADVISED THAT PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION OF YOUR PETITION FOR REVIEW DISCLOSED A NUMBER OF APPARENT DEFICIENCIES IN MEETING VARIOUS REQUIREMENTS OF THE APPLICABLE RULES OF PROCEDURE AND THE STATUTE. THE PERTINENT SECTIONS OF THE RULES INCLUDED: 5 C.F.R. 2411.25(A) AND (B), 2411.44 AND 2411.46(A), (C) AND (D)(1978). THE APPLICABLE PROVISION OF THE STATUTE WAS SECTION 7117(C)(2)(B). YOU WERE ALSO ADVISED IN THE AUTHORITY'S LETTER: FURTHER PROCESSING OF YOUR APPEAL IS CONTINGENT UPON YOUR COMPLIANCE WITH THE ABOVE-DESIGNATED PROVISIONS OF THE APPLICABLE RULES AND THE STATUTE. ACCORDINGLY, YOU ARE HEREBY GRANTED UNTIL THE CLOSE OF BUSINESS ON APRIL 2, 1979, TO TAKE NECESSARY ACTIONS AND FILE ADDITIONAL MATERIALS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THOSE REQUIREMENTS. SUCH FILING SHOULD BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 2411.43(B) OF THE RULES CITED, AND SHOULD BE SUBMITTED TO THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, 1900 E STREET, N.W. ROOM 7469, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20424. (FOOTNOTE OMITTED.) MOREOVER, YOU MUST SERVE A COPY OF ANY ADDITIONAL SUBMISSION ON THE OTHER PARTY, AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 2411.46(A) OF THE RULES CITED, AND ON THE AGENCY HEAD. SERVICE SHOULD BE BY REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL OR IN PERSON, AND YOU MUST INCLUDE A STATEMENT OF SUCH SERVICE WITH YOUR ADDITIONAL SUBMISSION TO THE AUTHORITY. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS WITHIN THE TIME LIMITS PRESCRIBED WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF YOUR APPEAL. YOUR SUBMISSION IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE STATED REQUIREMENTS WAS NOT FILED WITH THE AUTHORITY UNTIL APRIL 6, 1979. ACCORDINGLY, AND APART FROM OTHER CONSIDERATIONS, YOUR PETITION FOR REVIEW IS HEREBY DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE AUTHORITY'S RULES OF PROCEDURE WITHIN THE TIME LIMITS PRESCRIBED. HOWEVER, INASMUCH AS THE UNION NEVER SOUGHT AND RECEIVED AN ALLEGATION FROM THE AGENCY, WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 7117 OF THE STATUTE, AS TO WHETHER THE DUTY TO BARGAIN UNDER THE STATUTE EXTENDS TO THE MATTERS PROPOSED TO BE BARGAINED BY THE UNION, THE DISMISSAL OF YOUR APPEAL IS WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THAT IS, IF THE MATTERS PROPOSED TO BE NEGOTIATED CONTINUE IN DISPUTE BETWEEN THE PARTIES, AN ALLEGATION AS TO THEIR NEGOTIABILITY MAY BE SOUGHT AND A PETITION FOR REVIEW MAY BE FILED WITH THE AUTHORITY BY THE UNION UNDER THE STATUTE AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTERIM RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE AUTHORITY (COPIES ENCLOSED). FOR THE AUTHORITY. SINCERELY, HAROLD D. KESSLER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ENCLOSURES CC: M. A. SIMMS INTERIOR