[ v01 p177 ]
01:0177(22)AS
The decision of the Authority follows:
1 FLRA No. 22 APRIL 13, 1979 MR. RONALD D. KING, DIRECTOR CONTRACT AND APPEALS DIVISION AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO 1325 MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE, N.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005 RE: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY, A/SLMR No. 1168, Case No. 0-AS-10 DEAR MR. KING: THIS REFERS TO YOUR PETITION FOR REVIEW OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY'S DECISION IN THE ABOVE-ENTITLED CASE, FILED WITH THE AUTHORITY ON MARCH 29, 1979, ON BEHALF OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO (THE UNION). FOR THE REASONS INDICATED BELOW, IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT THE PETITION WAS UNTIMELY FILED UNDER THE APPLICABLE RULES OF PROCEDURE AND CANNOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. THE SUBJECT DECISION OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY IS DATED DECEMBER 28, 1978, AND WAS SERVED ON THE UNION BY MAIL ON THAT SAME DATE. THEREFORE, UNDER 5 C.F.R. 2411.13(B) AND 2411.45(A) AND (C)(1978), APPLICABLE HERE PURSUANT TO SECTION 2400.2 OF THE AUTHORITY'S TRANSITION RULES AND REGULATIONS (44 FED.REG. 7) (COPIES ENCLOSED), THE UNION'S APPEAL WAS DUE IN THE OFFICE OF THE AUTHORITY NO LATER THAN THE CLOSE OF BUSINESS ON FEBRUARY 1, 1979. HOWEVER, AS STATED ABOVE, THE UNION'S APPEAL, WHICH IS DATED MARCH 26, 1979, WAS NOT FILED WITH THE AUTHORITY UNTIL MARCH 29, 1979, OR ALMOST 2 MONTHS LATE, AND NO EXTENSION OF TIME FOR SUCH FILING WAS REQUESTED ON BEHALF OF THE UNION OR GRANTED BY THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS COUNCIL OR THE AUTHORITY. ACCORDINGLY, SINCE THE UNION'S APPEAL WAS UNTIMELY FILED WITH THE AUTHORITY, AND APART FROM OTHER CONSIDERATIONS, THE UNION'S PETITION FOR REVIEW IS HEREBY DENIED. FOR THE AUTHORITY. SINCERELY, HAROLD D. KESSLER DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ENCLOSURES CC: R. HACKER HEW