[ v32 p1235 ]
32:1235(166)AR
The decision of the Authority follows:
32 FLRA NO. 166 32 FLRA 1235 (1988) 22 SEP 1988 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE INDIANAPOLIS DISTRICT Agency and NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION, CHAPTER 49 Union Case No. 0-AR-1469 (32 FLRA 335) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION I. Statement of the Case The Agency has filed motions requesting the Authority to waive the expired time limit for filing a motion for reconsideration and to grant its motion for reconsideration of our decision in 32 FLRA 335 (June 9, 1988). The Union filed an opposition to the Agency's motions. For the reasons set forth below, we deny the Agency's motion for waiver of the expired time limit and, accordingly, do not consider the motion for reconsideration. II. Discussion Section 2429.17 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations provides in pertinent part: 2429.17 Reconsideration. After a final decision or order of the Authority has been issued, a party to the proceeding before the Authority who can establish in its moving papers extraordinary circumstances for so doing, may move for reconsideration of such final decision or order. The motion shall be filed within ten (10) days after service of the Authority's decision or order. The Authority's decision in 32 FLRA 335 was dated and served on the Agency by mail on June 9, 1988. Whenever a party is served by mail, 5 days are added to the prescribed period for filing a motion for reconsideration. 5 C.F.R. 2429.22. Therefore, in order to be timely filed, the Agency's motion for reconsideration had to be either mailed to the national office of the Authority in Washington, D.C., and postmarked by the U.S. Postal Service no later than June 27, 1988, or, if filed in person, received at the Authority's national office no later than the close of business that same date. 5 C.F.R. 2429.21(b). Computation of that date gives due allowance for weekends and holidays as required by section 2429.21. See United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, Metropolitan Correctional Center, New York, New York, 25 FLRA 102 (1986) (explaining the procedure for computing time periods). In the instant case, the Agency's motion for reconsideration was mailed to the Authority on or after June 28, 1988. As acknowledged by the Agency, the Agency's motion for reconsideration was untimely filed. The Agency requests a waiver of the time limit on the basis that the attorney responsible for the case was out of state in training, and, although he was telephonically informed on or about June 14, 1988, of the result of the case, he was "unable to review the Decision until returning" to his office. Motion for Waiver of Time Limitations at 1. Section 2429.23(b) of the Authority's Regulations permits the Authority to waive an expired time limit in "extraordinary circumstances." We find that the Agency has not shown the existence of "extraordinary circumstances" warranting the waiving of the expired time limit to file a request for reconsideration. As the Union notes in its opposition, Agency counsel has not shown that the fact that he was away from his office prevented him from receiving a copy of the decision or from timely filing a motion for reconsideration. While the Agency could have timely filed a motion for reconsideration, it did not do so. The Agency's motion for a waiver of the expired time limit for filing a motion for reconsideration does not present "extraordinary circumstances" warranting waiver of the time limit. Therefore, the Agency's motion must be denied. III. Order The Agency's motion for waiver of expired time limit to file a request for reconsideration is denied. Issued, Washington, D.C., September 22, 1988 Jerry L. Calhoun, Chairman Jean McKee, Member FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY