AMERICAN FEDERATION OF . GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, . LOCAL 1941, AFL-CIO . Charging Party .
Brent S. Hudspeth For the General Counsel
Before: Eli Nash, Jr. Administrative Law Judge
Statement of the Case
On May 20, 1992, the Regional Director of the Atlanta Region
of the Federal Labor Relations Authority (herein called the FLRA),
issued a Consolidated Complaint and Notice of Hearing which was
duly served by certified mail upon the named Respondent. The
Complaint alleged that Respondent violated section 7116(a)(1) and
(5) of the Statute by implementing a required lunch break schedule
for all Grocery Department Personnel, which conflicted with a
negotiated work schedule agreement entered into by the Respondent
and the Charging Party.
The Consolidated Complaint allowed Respondent the requisite
20 days, until June 15, 1992 to file an answer pursuant to section
2423.13 of the FLRA's Rules and Regulations. Respondent filed no
answer within the required period.
On or around November 9, 1992, Counsel for the General
Counsel moved for summary judgment and submitted a supporting
brief. The Acting Regional Director, pursuant to section 2423.22(b)
of the FLRA's Rules and Regulations referred the motion to the
Chief Administrative Law Judge. On November 20, 1992, the Chief
Administrative Law Judge issued an Order granting all parties until
December 7, 1992 to file Responses. Thereafter, the case was
assigned to the undersigned for disposition pursuant to section
2423.19(t) and section 2423.22(b)(3) of the FLRA regulations. To
date there have been no responses to the Order of the Chief
Administrative Law Judge nor has any party sought special
permission to file any further materials in the matter.
Since Respondent failed to reply to either the Consolidated
Complaint or the Order of the Chief Administrative Law Judge, it is
recommended that the motion for summary judgment be granted for the
following reasons:
Findings and Conclusions
Section 2423.13(b) of the Regulations provides, in pertinent
part:
Failure to file an answer or to plead specifically to or explain any allegation shall
constitute an admission of such allegation and shall be so found by the Authority,
unless good cause to the contrary is shown.
The failure of Respondent to file any answer in this case
requires a finding that it has admitted all the allegations of the
instant Consolidated Complaint. Therefore, no genuine issue of fact
exists in the matter and disposition by summary judgment is
proper.
Consequently, the uncontested facts disclose that on October
17, 1991, Respondent entered into an agreement with the Charging
Party establishing new work hours and a tour of duty schedule for
unit member, Dennis Thomas. Sometime around October 29, 1991,
Respondent by Grocery Department Manager James George, implemented
a required lunch break and break schedule for all Grocery
Department Personnel. Beginning sometime around October 29, 1991
and continuing to date, this schedule has been applied to Thomas
although it conflicts with the work schedule which the Charging
Party and Respondent negotiated on Thomas' behalf. Respondent
implemented the above lunch break schedule without providing the
Charging Party with notice and an opportunity to bargain over the
substance or the impact and implementation of the change.
Thereafter, sometime around November 27, 1991 the Charging Party
was notified by Commissary Officer James L. Wolfe that the schedule
previously negotiated for Thomas would not be honored.
In accord with Counsel for the General Counsel, it is found
that the topic of timing of breaks and meal period is substantively
negotiable. See, e.g., U. S. Department of Agriculture,
Agricultural Research Service and America Federation of Government
Employee, Local 1940, 37 FLRA 1058, 1063 (1990).
Furthermore, I agree that the repudiation of the instant agreement
is an independent violation of the Statute. Department of Defense, Warner Robin Air Logistics Center,
Robins Air Force Base, Georgia, 40 FLRA 1211, 1218
(1989).
While in agreement with Counsel for the General Counsel that
two separate violations are involved in this matter, it is my
opinion that the proposed remedy of the General Counsel does not
effectuate the purposes of the Statute. It is my belief that
Respondent should be required to live up to the negotiated
agreement until it reaches a new agreement with the Union
concerning employee Dennis Thomas' new work hours and tour of duty
schedule. Thus the responsibility should be placed on Respondent,
and not the Union to seek bargaining in that respect.
In light of the foregoing, it is recommended that the
Authority grant Counsel for the General Counsel's motion for
summary judgment and issue the following:
ORDER
Pursuant to section 2423.29 of the Authority's Rules and
Regulations and section 7118 of the Federal Service
Labor-Management Relations Statute, the Defense Commissary Agency,
Fort MCClellan Commissary Store, Fort MCClellan, Alabama shall:
1. Cease and desist from:
(a) Failing and refusing to honor the agreement
it negotiated with the American Federation of Government Employees,
Local 1941, the employees' exclusive representative, by failing and
refusing to assign employee Dennis Thomas to the shift required by
the agreement.
(b) In any like or related manner, interfering
with, restraining, or coercing its employees in the exercise
Labor-Management Relations Statute.
2. Take the following affirmative action in order to
effectuate the purposes and policies of the Federal Service
Labor-Management Relations Statute:
(a) Upon request by the American Federation of
Government Employees, Local 1941, the employees' exclusive
representative, assign employee Dennis Thomas, to the shift
required by the parties' agreement.
(b) Post at its MCClellan Commissary Store
facilities where employees in the bargaining unit are located
copies of the attached Notice on forms to be furnished by the
Federal Labor Relations Authority. Upon receipt of such forms, they
shall be signed by the Commissary Officer and shall be posted and
maintained for 60 consecutive days thereafter in conspicuous
places, including all bulletin boards and other places where
notices to employees are customarily posted. Reasonable steps shall
be taken to ensure that such Notices are not altered, defaced, or
covered by any other material.
(c) Pursuant to section 2423.30 of the
Authority's Rules and Regulations, notify the Regional Director,
Atlanta, Georgia Regional Office, Federal Labor Relations
Authority, in writing, within 30 days from the date of this Order,
as to what steps have been taken to comply.
Issued, Washington, DC, December 23, 1992
____________________________
Eli Nash, Jr.
Administrative Law Judge
Dated: December 23 1992
Washington, DC
NOTICE TO ALL EMPLOYEES
AS ORDER BY THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
AND TO EFFECTUATE THE POLICIES OF THE
FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATION STATUE
WE WILL NOTIFY OUR EMPLOYEES THAT:
WE WILL NOT fail and refuse to honor the agreement we negotiated
with the American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1941,
our employees' exclusive representative, by failing and refusing to
assign employee to the shift required by the agreement.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner, interfere with
restrain, or coerce our employees in the exercise of their rights
assured by the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations
Statute.
WE WILL, upon request by the American Federation of Government
Employees, Local 1941, our employees' exclusive representative,
assign employee Dennis Thomas, to the shift required by the
agreement.
_______________________
(Activity)
Dated: ____________________________ By: ______________________________
(Signature) (Title)
This notice must remain posted for 60 consecutive days from the
date of posting, and must not be altered, defaced, or covered by
any other material.
If employees have any question concerning this Notice or compliance with any of its provisions, they may communicate directly with the Regional Director, Atlanta, Georgia Regional Office, Federal Labor Relations Authority, whose address is: 1371 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 122, Atlanta, GA 30367, and whose telephone number is:
(404) 347-2324.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that copies of this DECISION issued by ELI
NASH, JR., Administrative Law Judge, in Case Nos. AT-CA-20125 and
AT-CA-20132, were sent to the following parties in the manner
indicated:
___________________________
CERTIFIED MAIL:
Donna Sanders, President
American Federation of Government
Employees, Local 1941
P.O. Box 5094
Fort MCClellan, AL 36205-5000
Joseph H. Doyle, Esquire
Office of the Staff Judge Advocate
Buckner Circle, Building 63
Fort MCClellan, AL 36205
Mr. Brent S. Hudspeth
Federal Labor Relation Authority
1371 Peachtree Street, NE, Suite 122
Atlanta, GA 30367
December 23, 1992
Washington, DC
DATE: DECEMBER 23, 1992
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20424
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
DEFENSE COMMISSARY AGENCY, .
FORT MCCLELLAN COMMISSARY .
STORE, FORT MCCLELLAN, ALABAMA .
.
Respondent .
.
and . Case Nos. AT-CA-20125
.
AT-CA-20132
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF .
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, .
LOCAL 1941, AFL-CIO .
Charging Party .
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Brent S. Hudspeth
For the General Counsel
Before: Eli Nash, Jr.
Administrative Law Judge
DECISION
Statement of the Case
On May 20, 1992, the Regional Director of the Atlanta Region
of the Federal Labor Relations Authority (herein called the FLRA),
issued a Consolidated Complaint and Notice of Hearing which was
duly served by certified mail upon the named Respondent. The
Complaint alleged that Respondent violated section 7116 (a)(1) and
(5) of the Statute by implementing a required lunch break schedule
for all Grocery Department Personnel, which conflicted with a
negotiated work schedule agreement entered into by the Respondent
and the Charging Party.
The Consolidated Complaint allowed Respondent the requisite
20 days, until June 15, 1992 to file an answer pursuant to section
2423.13 of the FLRA's Rules and Regulations. Respondent filed no
answer within the required period.
On or around November 9, 1992, Counsel for the General
Counsel moved for summary judgment and submitted a supporting
brief. The Acting Regional Director, pursuant to section 2423.22(b)
of the FLRA's Rules and Regulations referred the motion to the
Chief Administrative Law Judge. On November 20, 1992, the Chief
Administrative Law Judge issued an Order granting all parties until
December 7, 1992 to file Responses. Thereafter, the case was
assigned to the undersigned for disposition pursuant to section
2423.19(t) and section 2423.22(b)(3) of the FLRA regulations. To
date there have been no responses to the Order of the Chief
Administrative Law Judge nor has any party sought special
permission to file any further materials in the matter.
Since Respondent failed to reply to either the Consolidated
Complaint or the Order of the Chief Administrative Law Judge, it is
recommended that the motion for summary judgment be granted for the
following reasons:
Findings and Conclusions
Section 2423.13(b) of the Regulations provides, in pertinent
part:
Failure to file an answer or to plead specifically to or explain any allegation shall
constitute an admission of such allegation and shall be so found by the Authority, unless
good cause to the contrary is shown.
The failure of Respondent to file any answer in this case
requires a finding that it has admitted all the allegations of the
instant Consolidated Complaint. Therefore, no genuine issue of fact
exists in the matter and disposition by summary judgment is
proper.
Consequently, the uncontested facts disclose that on October
17, 1991, Respondent entered into an agreement with the Charging
Party establishing new work hours and a tour of duty schedule for
unit member, Dennis Thomas. Sometime around October 29, 1991,
Respondent by Grocery Department Manager James George, implemented
a required lunch break and break schedule for all Grocery
Department Personnel. Beginning sometime around October 29, 1991
and continuing to date, this schedule has been applied to Thomas
although it conflicts with the work schedule which the Charging
Party and Respondent negotiated on Thomas' behalf. Respondent
implemented the above lunch break schedule without providing the
Charging Party with notice and an opportunity to bargain over the
substance or the impact and implementation of the change.
Thereafter, sometime around November 27, 1991 the Charging Party
was notified by Commissary Officer James L. Wolfe that the schedule
previously negotiated for Thomas would not be honored.
In accord with Counsel for the General Counsel, it is found
that the topic of timing of breaks and meal period is substantively
negotiable. See, e.g., U. S. Department of Agriculture,
Agricultural Research Service and America Federation of Government
Employee, Local 1940, 37 FLRA 1058, 1063 (1990).
Furthermore, I agree that the repudiation of the instant agreement
is an independent violation of the Statute. Department of Defense, Warner Robin Air Logistics Center,
Robins Air Force Base, Georgia, 40 FLRA 1211, 1218
(1989).
While in agreement with Counsel for the General Counsel that
two separate violations are involved in this matter, it is my
opinion that the proposed remedy of the General Counsel does not
effectuate the purposes of the Statute. It is my belief that
Respondent should be required to live up to the negotiated
agreement until it reaches a new agreement with the Union
concerning employee Dennis Thomas' new work hours and tour of duty
schedule. Thus the responsibility should be placed on Respondent,
and not the Union to seek bargaining in that respect.
In light of the foregoing, it is recommended that the
Authority grant Counsel for the General Counsel's motion for
summary judgment and issue the following:
ORDER
Pursuant to section 2423.29 of the Authority's Rules and
Regulations and section 7118 of the Federal Service
Labor-Management Relations Statute, the Defense Commissary Agency,
Fort MCClellan Commissary Store, Fort MCClellan, Alabama shall:
1. Cease and desist from:
(a) Failing and refusing to honor the agreement it negotiated with the American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1941, the employees' exclusive
representative, by failing and refusing to assign employee
Dennis Thomas to the shift required by the agreement.
(b) In any like or related manner, interfering
with, restraining, or coercing its employees in the exercise
Labor-Management Relations Statute.
2. Take the following affirmative action in order to
effectuate the purposes and policies of the Federal Service
Labor-Management Relations Statute:
(a) Upon request by the American Federation of
Government Employees, Local 1941, the employees' exclusive
representative, assign employee Dennis Thomas, to the shift
required by the parties' agreement.
(b) Post at its MCClellan Commissary Store
facilities where employees in the bargaining unit are located
copies of the attached Notice on forms to be furnished by the
Federal Labor Relations Authority. Upon receipt of such forms, they
shall be signed by the Commissary Officer and shall be posted and
maintained for 60 consecutive days thereafter in conspicuous
places, including all bulletin boards and other places where
notices to employees are customarily posted. Reasonable steps shall
be taken to ensure that such Notices are not altered, defaced, or
covered by any other material.
(c) Pursuant to section 2423.30 of the
Authority's Rules and Regulations, notify the Regional Director,
Atlanta, Georgia Regional Office, Federal Labor Relations
Authority, in writing, within 30 days from the date of this Order,
as to what steps have been taken to comply.
Issued, Washington, DC, December 23, 1992
______________________________
Eli Nash, Jr
Administrative Law Judge
Dated: December 23, 1992
Washington, DC
NOTICE TO ALL EMPLOYEES
AS ORDER BY THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
AND TO EFFECTUATE THE POLICIES OF THE
FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATION STATUE
WE WILL NOTIFY OUR EMPLOYEES THAT:
WE WILL NOT fail and refuse to honor the agreement we negotiated
with the American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1941,
our employees' exclusive representative, by failing and refusing to
assign employee to the shift required by the agreement.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner, interfere with
restrain, or coerce our employees in the exercise of their rights
assured by the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations
Statute.
WE WILL, upon request by the American Federation of Government
Employees, Local 1941, our employees' exclusive representative,
assign employee Dennis Thomas, to the shift required by the
agreement.
_______________________________
(Activity)
Dated:_________________________By:_____________________________
(Signature) (Title)
This notice must remain posted for 60 consecutive days from the
date of posting, and must not be altered, defaced, or covered by
any other material.
If employees have any question concerning this Notice or compliance with any of its provisions, they may communicate directly with the Regional Director, Atlanta, Georgia Regional Office, Federal Labor Relations Authority, whose address is: 1371 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 122, Atlanta, GA 30367, and whose telephone number is:
(404) 347-2324.