31:0076(13)AC - DOI, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Navajo Area, Gallup, NM and National Council of Bureau of Indian Affairs Educators; DOI, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Albuquerque, NM and National Council of Bureau of Indian Affairs Educators; DOI, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Albuquerque, NM and DOI, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, DC and National Council of Bureau of Indian Affairs Educators/AFT; DOI, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Navajo Area, Gallup, NM and DOI, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, DC and National Council of Bureau of Indian Affairs Educators/AFT -- 1988 FLRAdec RP
[ v31 p76 ]
31:0076(13)AC
The decision of the Authority follows:
31 FLRA NO. 13 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS NAVAJO AREA, GALLUP, NEW MEXICO Activity and NATIONAL COUNCIL OF BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS EDUCATORS Petitioner Case No. 6-AC-70006 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO Activity and NATIONAL COUNCIL OF BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS EDUCATORS Petitioner Case No. 6-AC-70005 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO Activity and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS WASHINGTON, D.C. Petitioner and NATIONAL COUNCIL OF BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS EDUCATORS/AFT Labor Organization/Incumbent Case No. 6-RA-70001 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS NAVAJO AREA OFFICE GALLUP, NEW MEXICO Activity and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS WASHINGTON, D.C. Petitioner and NATIONAL COUNCIL OF BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS EDUCATORS/AFT Labor Organization/Incumbent Case Nos. 6-RA-70002 6-RA-80001 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATIONS FOR REVIEW AND STAY On December 16, 1987, the Department of Interior (DOI) filed a timely application for review pursuant to section 2422.17(a) of the Authority's Rules and Regulations seeking to set aside the Regional Director's decision in Case Nos. 6-AC-70005, 6-AC-70006, 6-RA-70001, 6-RA-70002 and 6-RA-80001. */ On December 21, 1987, the National Education Association (NEA) filed a timely application for review pursuant to section 2422.17(a) of the Authority's Rules and Regulations seeking to set aside the Regional Director's decisions in Case Nos. 6-AC-70005 and 6-AC-70006. The National Council of Bureau of Indian Affairs Educator's (NCBIAE) filed an opposition to the applications for review. In Case Nos. 6-AC-70005 and 6-AC-70006, the Regional Director granted the NCBIAE Amendment of Certification (AC) petitions changing its affiliation from NEA to the American Federation of Teachers (AFT). In Case Nos. 6-RA-70001, 6-RA-70002 and 6-RA-80001, the Regional Director dismissed the DOI's Representative Status (RA) petitions which questioned the continued majority status of NCBIAE. The Regional Director found that there was insufficient evidence to support DOI's claim that NCBIAE no longer represents a majority of the employees in the existing units. NEA and DOI contend that compelling reasons exist within the meaning of section 2422.17(c) of the Authority's Rules and Regulations for granting the applications for review. Upon full and complete consideration of DOI's and NEA's applications for review, we find that DOI and NEA have established that compelling reasons exist for granting the applications for review pursuant to the provisions of section 2422.17(c)(4) of the Authority's Rules and Regulations. Accordingly, pursuant to section 2422.17(g) of our rules and regulations, we grant the applications for review of the Regional Director's decisions. We also grant a stay of the Regional Director's decisions in Case Nos. 6-AC-70005 and 6-AC-70006 ending final action regarding the applications for review. Issued, Washington, D.C., February 12, 1988 Jerry L. Calhoun, Chairman Jean McKee, Member FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY FOOTNOTES Footnote */ The DOI also seeks review of a letter of the Regional Director, dated December 2, 1987, in Case Nos. 6-RA-80002 and 6-RA-80003. In that letter, the Regional Director informed the DOI that he was holding those cases in abeyance pending final disposition of the petitions in Case Nos. 6-RA-70001, 6-RA-70002 and 6-RA-80001. We find that the Regional Director's letter is not a final decision for purposes of filing an application for review under section 2422.17 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations. Rather, the letter is an interlocutory action by the Regional Director in Case Nos. 6-RA-80002 and 6-RA-80003. Section 2429.11 of the Rules and Regulations provides that the Authority ordinarily will not consider interlocutory appeals and DOI has provided no persuasive reason for us to do so in this instance. Therefore, DOI's request for review of the Regional Director's letter is dismissed.