26:0691(85)CA - Army and Air Force, Army and Air Force Exchange Service, HQ, Dallas, TX and Army and Air Force Exchange Service, McClellan AFB, CA and AFGE Local 1857 -- 1987 FLRAdec CA
[ v26 p691 ]
26:0691(85)CA
The decision of the Authority follows:
26 FLRA No. 85 DEPARTMENTS OF THE ARMY AND AIR FORCE ARMY AND AIR FORCE EXCHANGE SERVICE HEADQUARTERS, DALLAS, TEXAS AND ARMY AND AIR FORCE EXCHANGE SERVICE McCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE, CALIFORNIA Respondent and AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1857, AFL-CIO Charging Party Case No. 9-CA-60288 DECISION AND ORDER I. Statement of the Case This matter is before the Authority under section 2429.1(a) of our Regulations based on the parties' stipulation of facts. The complaint alleges that the Respondent violated section 7116(a)(1) and (8) of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (the Statute) by refusing to provide the Union with the names and home addresses of all employees in the McClellan Air Force Base Exchange bargaining unit. The General Counsel and the Respondent have filed briefs with the Authority. For the reasons discussed below, we find that the Respondent has committed the unfair labor practices as alleged. II. Background By letter dated May 5, 1986, the President of AFGE Local 1857 (the Union) requested the Manager of the McClellan Air Force Base Exchange to provide the Union with the names and home addresses of all bargaining unit employees at the Exchange. There are 82 employees in the unit, of whom 29 are regular full-time and 53 are regular part-time employees. In its request for the information, the Union cited American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1760 v. FLRA, 756 F.2d 554 (2d Cir. 1986). Later in May, the Respondent gave the Union a listing of the names, job titles and job locations of employees in the bargaining unit, but did not provide the employees' home addresses. The Respondent has continued to refuse to provide the home addresses of employees to the Union. The parties have stipulated that the information requested by the Union constitutes data within the meaning of section 7114(b)(4) of the Statute which is normally maintained by the Respondent in the regular course of business; is reasonably available and necessary for full and proper discussion, understanding, and negotiation of subjects within collective bargaining; and does not constitute guidance, advice, counsel, or training provided for local management officials or supervisors relating to collective bargaining. III. Positions of the Parties A. The Respondent The Respondent asserts that this case presents an issue which distinguishes it from our decision on remand in the lead "names and home addresses" case, Farmers Home Administration Finance Office, St. Louis, Missouri, 23 FLRA No. 101 (1986), petition for review filed sub nom. U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Farmers Home Administration Finance Office, St. Louis, Missouri v. FLRA, No. 86-2579 (8th Cir. Dec. 23, 1986). The Respondent argues that in deciding that release of the names and home addresses of bargaining unit employees to the exclusive representative was not prohibited by law, the Authority placed great weight on an analysis of exception (b)(3) of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. section 552a(b)(3), which permits disclosure of information for a "routine use." The Respondent further argues that published statements of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), which define routine uses of information in personnel records and include labor organizations as routine users of that information, were a key factor in the Authority's decision that disclosure of employees' home addresses to unions was permitted as a routine use under exception (b)(3) of the Privacy Act. The Respondent notes that the employees in this case are employed by the Army and Air Force Exchange Service (AAFES) and are not subject to OPM regulations, and therefore the OPM routine use statement does not apply to them. The Respondent also notes that the AAFES routine use statements do not include labor organizations as routine users of information in AAFES' systems of records, and therefore contends that disclosure of employees' home addresses to the Union cannot be made under exception (b)(3) of the Privacy Act. Accordingly, the Respondent contends that the "routine user" theory which we applied in Farmers Home cannot be applied in this case. The Respondent asserts that we must decide this case by balancing the employees' right to privacy against the public interest in disclosure, and that in so doing we should reconsider our Farmers Home decision and apply the decision of the court in American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1923 v. United States, Department of Health and Human Service, 712 F.2d 931 (4th Cir. 1983). Finally, the Respondent notes that in 1985 it had attempted to make a reasonable accommodation to AFGE by providing an alternate way for it to obtain the home addresses of employees; however, the Respondent states that it does not pursue this point because we ruled on this theory in Farmers Home. B. The General Counsel The General Counsel argues that our decision in Farmers Home is controlling in this case. The General Counsel submits that the Respondent's refusal to provide the home addresses of bargaining unit employees violates section 7114(b)(4) of the Statute and constitutes the unfair labor practices alleged in the complaint. IV. Analysis and Conclusions In our decision on remand in Farmers Home, we held that the release of the names and home addresses of bargaining unit employees to exclusive representatives is not prohibited by law, is necessary for unions to fulfill their duties under the Statute, and meets all of the other requirements of section 7114(b)(4). Our decision in Farmers Home analyzed the two exceptions to the Privacy Act's bar to disclosure of personal information pertinent to the release of employees' names and home addresses: exception (b)(2) concerning the Freedom of Information Act, and exception (b)(3) relating to "routine use" of information. The Respondent correctly notes that AAFES employees are not subject to OPM regulations; that the employees' personnel files are not governed by the OPM's routine use statements; and that AAFES' routine use statements do not include unions as routine users. Therefore, disclosure of McClellan Air Force Base Exchange employees' home addresses to the Union may not be authorized under exception (b)(3) of the Privacy Act. However, this distinction does not affect the disclosure of these employees' home addresses to the Union under exception (b)(2) of the Privacy Act. Exception (b)(2) states that if the disclosure of the requested information is required by the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), the Privacy Act's bar to disclosure is not applicable. 5 U.S.C. section 552a(b)(2). In Farmers Home, we discussed exception (b)(2) and applied the necessary balancing test under the FOIA. We stated in Farmers Home (slip op. at 6): On balance, we find that the public interest to be furthered by providing the Union with an efficient method to communicate with unit employees it must represent far outweighs the privacy interests of individual employees in their names and home addresses. Disclosure of the requested information would not constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy and does not fall within the (b)(6) exemption to the FOIA. Since the information does not fall within the exemption, its disclosure is required under the FOIA and, under exception (b)(2) to the Privacy Act, its release is not prohibited by law. We reaffirm that conclusion here, and find that the information sought by the Union could be released by the Respondent under exception (b)(2) of the Privacy Act. For the reasons set forth more fully in Farmers Home, we reject the Respondent's suggestion that we adopt the approach of the court in AFGE, Local 1923, 712 F.2d 931. We also find, as we did in Farmers Home, that the release of the information is generally required without regard to whether alternative means of communication are available. Further, through the parties' stipulation, it is evident that the other requirements of section 7114 (b)(4)(A), (B) and (C) have been met. Consistent with our decision in Farmers Home, we therefore find that the Respondent was required to furnish the Union with the home addresses of the employees in the bargaining unit. Its refusal to do so violated section 7116(a)(1) and (8) of the Statute. V. Order Pursuant to section 2423.29 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations and section 7118 of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute, the Departments of the Army and Air Force, Army and Air Force Exchange Service, Headquarters, Dallas, Texas and the Army and Air Force Exchange Service, McClellan Air Force Base, California, shall: 1. Cease and desist from: (a) Refusing to furnish, upon request of the American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1857, ALF-CIO, the exclusive representative of its employees, the names and home addresses of all bargaining unit employees located at its McClellan Air Force Base Exchange. (b) In any like or related manner, interfering with, restraining, or coercing its employees in the exercise of rights assured them by the Statute. 2. Take the following affirmative action in order to effectuate the purposes and policies of the Statute: (a) Upon request by the American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1857, AFL-CIO, the exclusive representative of its employees, furnish it with the names and home addresses of all bargaining unit employees located at its McClellan Air Force Base Exchange. (b) Post at all its facilities at the McClellan Air Force Base Exchange, where bargaining unit employees represented by the American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1857, AFL-CIO are located, copies of the attached Notice on forms to be furnished by the Federal Labor Relations Authority. Upon receipt of such forms, they shall be signed by the Directors of the Departments of the Army and Air Force, Army and Air Force Exchange Service, Headquarters, Dallas, Texas and the Army and Air Force Exchange Service, McClellan Air Force Base, California, and shall be posted and maintained for 60 consecutive days thereafter, in conspicuous places, including all bulletin boards and other places where notices to employees are customarily posted. Reasonable steps shall be taken to ensure that such Notices are not altered, defaced, or covered by any other material. (c) Pursuant to section 2423.30 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations, notify the Regional Director, Region IX, Federal Labor Relations Authority, in writing, within 30 days from the date of this Order, as to what steps have been taken to comply with this Order. Issued, Washington, D.C., April 28, 1987. /s/ Jerry L. Clahoun, Chairman /s/ Henry B. Frazier III, Member /s/ Jean McKee, Member FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY NOTICE TO ALL EMPLOYEES PURSUANT TO A DECISION AND ORDER OF THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY AND IN ORDER TO EFFECTUATE THE POLICIES OF CHAPTER 71 OF TITLE 5 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE WE HEREBY NOTIFY OUR EMPLOYEES THAT: WE WILL NOT refuse to furnish, upon request of the American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1857, AFL-CIO, the exclusive representative of our employees, the names and home addresses of all bargaining unit employees located at our McClellan Air Force Base Exchange. WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere with, restrain, or coerce our employees in the exercise of rights assured them by the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute. WE WILL, upon request by the American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1857, AFL-CIO, the exclusive representative of our employees, furnish it with the names and home addresses of all bargaining unit employees located at our McClellan Air Force Base Exchange. (Activity) . . . Dated: . . . By: (Signature) . . . (Title) . . . Dated: . . . By: (Signature) . . . (Title) . . . This Notice must remain posted for 60 consecutive days from the date of posting, and must not be altered, defaced, or covered by any other material. If employees have any questions concerning this Notice or compliance with its provisions, they may communicate directly with the Regional Director, Region IX, Federal Labor Relations Authority, whose address is: 901 Market Street, Suite 200, San Francisco, California 94103, and whose telephone number is: (415) 995-5000.