---

 19 FLRA No. 72
 
 MARINE CORPS LOGISTICS BASE,
 ALBANY, GEORGIA
 Activity
 
 and
 
 AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
 EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 2317
 Union
 
                                            Case No. O-AR-929
 
                                 DECISION
 
    This matter is before the Authority on an exception to the award of
 Arbitrator H. Ellsworth Steele filed by the Agency under section 7122(a)
 of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute and part 2425
 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations.
 
    A grievance was filed and submitted to arbitration challenging
 management's assignment of a portion of the grievant's duties to
 military personnel.  The Arbitrator concluded that it had not been
 demonstrated that civilian employees cannot successfully perform the
 duties in question and that the Activity did not have the right to move
 duties from a civilian employee position to military personnel without
 negotiating with the Union.  Thus, the Arbitrator determined that the
 Activity had acted improperly and accordingly ordered as follows:
 
          Unless the parties agree otherwise within 60 days from the date
       of this award, the duties at issue must be returned to civilians.
 
    In its exception the Agency contends that the award is deficient as
 contrary to section 7106(a) of the Statute.  The Authority agrees.
 
    The Authority has repeatedly recognized that the plain language of
 section 7106 provides that "nothing" in the Statute shall "affect the
 authority" of an agency to exercise the rights enumerated in that
 section.  E.g., American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO,
 Local 1968 and Department of Transportation, Saint Lawrence Seaway
 Development Corporation, Massena, New York, 5 FLRA 70, 79 (1981), aff'd
 sub nom. AFGE Local 1968 v. FLRA, 691 F.2d 565 (D.C. Cir. 1982), cert.
 denied, 461 U.S. 926 (1983).  Therefore, the Authority has consistently
 held that no arbitration award may improperly deny an agency the
 authority to exercise its rights under that section or result in the
 substitution of the arbitrator's judgment for that of the agency in the
 exercise of these rights.  Id.; National Treasury Employees Union and
 U.S. Customs Service, 17 FLRA No. 12 (1985), U.S. Customs Service,
 Laredo, Texas and Chapter 145, National Treasury Employees Union, 17
 FLRA No. 17 (1985).  Section 7106(a)(2)(B) of the Statute, in
 particular, reserves to management officials the authority to assign
 work.  Encompassed within this right is the discretion to determine the
 particular personnel to whom work will be assigned.  E.g., National
 Treasury Employees Union, Chapter 204 and Federal Election Commission,
 19 FLRA No. 25 (1985), slip op. at 2-3.  Furthermore, the Authority has
 consistently found proposals that would limit management's right to
 assign bargaining-unit work outside the bargaining unit to conflict with
 management's right to assign work.  E.g., International Brotherhood of
 Electrical Workers, Local 570, AFL-CIO-CLC and Department of the Army,
 Yuma Proving Ground, Arizona, 14 FLRA 432 (1984) (proposals 1-3);
 National Association of Air Traffic Specialists and Department of
 Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, 6 FLRA 588 (1981)
 (proposal 5).  In terms of this case, the Authority similarly finds that
 the award conflicts with management's right to assign work.  By
 directing that the disputed duties be returned to civilians, the
 Arbitrator, contrary to section 7106(a)(2)(B), has substituted his
 judgment for that of management as to whom will be assigned that work.
 Therefore, the Authority finds that the award is deficient as contrary
 to management's right to assign work pursuant to section 7106(a)(2)(B)
 of the Statute.  /1/ Accordingly, the award is modified by striking the
 order of the Arbitrator quoted above.  /2/ 
 
 Issued, Washington, D.C., August 12, 1985
 
                                       Henry B. Frazier III, Acting
                                       Chairman
                                       William J. McGinnis, Jr., Member
                                       FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
 
 
 
 
 
 
 --------------- FOOTNOTES$ ---------------
 
 
    /1/ In this regard with respect to the agency policies cited by the
 Arbitrator, the Arbitrator did not find and it is not apparent that the
 award is otherwise authorized by such policies.
 
 
    /2/ In view of this decision, it is not necessary that the Authority
 address other provisions of section 7106(a) raised by the Agency in its
 exception. 
 
 
 

---