09:0670(76)NG - Wyoming Nurses Association, Inc. and VA Medical Center, Sheridan, WY -- 1982 FLRAdec NG
[ v09 p670 ]
09:0670(76)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
9 FLRA No. 76 WYOMING NURSES ASSOCIATION, INC. (Union) and VETERANS ADMINISTRATION MEDICAL CENTER, SHERIDAN, WYOMING (Activity) Case No. O-NG-698 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION THIS CASE IS BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR RULING ON A MOTION FILED BY THE UNION SEEKING RECONSIDERATION OF THE AUTHORITY'S ORDER OF JULY 28, 1982, DISMISSING THE UNION'S PETITION FOR REVIEW AS UNTIMELY FILED (9 FLRA NO. 76(1982)). FOR THE REASON SET OUT BELOW, THE UNION'S MOTION MUST BE DENIED. AS SET FORTH IN THE SUBJECT ORDER OF THE AUTHORITY, THE AGENCY'S ALLEGATION OF NONNEGOTIABILITY WAS SERVED ON THE UNION BY MAIL ON MAY 18, 1982. THEREFORE, PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 2424.3 AND 2429.22 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS THE UNION'S PETITION FOR REVIEW HAD TO BE FILED IN THE AUTHORITY'S NATIONAL OFFICE NO LATER THAN JUNE 7, 1982. HOWEVER, THE UNION'S PETITION, WHICH WAS ORIGINALLY MISFILED IN THE AUTHORITY'S DENVER REGIONAL OFFICE ON JUNE 9, 1982, WAS NOT FILED IN THE NATIONAL OFFICE UNTIL JUNE 21, 1982, AND WAS THEREFORE DISMISSED AS UNTIMELY. IN THE INSTANT MOTION, THE UNION RECOGNIZES THAT ITS APPEAL WAS UNTIMELY FILED UNDER THE STATUTE AND THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS, BUT REQUESTS RECONSIDERATION OF THE DISMISSAL ACTION ON THE GROUNDS THAT (1) THE UNION OFFICE OPERATES ON PART-TIME BASIS AND IS STAFFED BY ONLY TWO PART-TIME EMPLOYEES; (2) THE UNION'S REPRESENTATIVE IN THIS CASE WAS OUT OF TOWN ON UNION BUSINESS WHEN THE AGENCY'S ALLEGATION WAS RECEIVED IN THE OFFICE; (3) THE APPEAL WAS INADVERTENTLY MISDIRECTED TO THE WRONG AUTHORITY OFFICE AND THE MISTAKE WAS CORRECTED AS SOON AS IT WAS DISCOVERED; AND (4) THE UNION'S REPRESENTATIVES HAD NOT PREVIOUSLY ENCOUNTERED ANY SIMILAR NEGOTIABILITY DISPUTE AND WERE UNFAMILIAR WITH THE APPEAL PROCESS AND THE RELEVANT PROVISIONS IN THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS. SECTION 2429.17 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS PROVIDES, IN PERTINENT PART: AFTER A FINAL DECISION OR ORDER OF THE AUTHORITY HAS BEEN ISSUED, A PARTY TO THE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE AUTHORITY WHO CAN ESTABLISH IN ITS MOVING PAPERS EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES FOR SO DOING, MAY MOVE FOR RECONSIDERATION OF SUCH FINAL DECISION OR ORDER. THE GROUNDS ADVERTED TO IN THE UNION'S MOTION DO NOT WARRANT RECONSIDERATION OF THE AUTHORITY'S ORDER OF JULY 28, 1982. THAT IS, OFFICE STAFFING PROBLEMS, THE PRESSURE OF OTHER WORK COMMITMENTS, INADVERTENT MISFILING, AND LACK OF AWARENESS OF THE TIME LIMITS FOR FILING AN APPEAL OR FAMILIARITY WITH THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS DO NOT, SEPARATELY OR COLLECTIVELY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE FACTS OF THIS CASE, CONSTITUTE "EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES" WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 2429.17 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS. ACCORDINGLY, SINCE THE UNION HAS FAILED TO ESTABLISH THE PRESENCE OF EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES WARRANTING RECONSIDERATION OF THE ORDER OF JULY 28, 1982, UNION'S MOTION IS HEREBY DENIED. ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., SEPTEMBER 24, 1982 RONALD W. HAUGHTON, CHAIRMAN HENRY B. FRAZIER III, MEMBER LEON B. APPLEWHAITE, MEMBER FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY