[ v08 p197 ]
08:0197(38)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
8 FLRA No. 38 NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION AND NTEU CHAPTER 80 Union and DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, CENTRAL REGION Agency Case No. 0-NG-353 DECISION AND ORDER ON NEGOTIABILITY ISSUES THE PETITION FOR REVIEW IN THIS CASE COMES BEFORE THE FEDERAL LAB OR RELATIONS AUTHORITY (THE AUTHORITY) PURSUANT TO SECTION 7105(A)(2)(E) OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE (THE STATUTE) AND RAISES ISSUES CONCERNING THE NEGOTIABILITY OF SEVEN UNION PROPOSALS SUBMITTED TO ADDRESS CHANGED WORKING CONDITIONS OCCASIONED BY THE AGENCY'S DECISION TO ADOPT AN OPEN SPACE OFFICE ARRANGEMENT. UPON CAREFUL CONSIDERATION OF THE ENTIRE RECORD, INCLUDING THE PARTIES' CONTENTIONS, THE AUTHORITY MAKES THE FOLLOWING DETERMINATIONS. UNION PROPOSALS 1-6 1. (A) PARTITIONS SHALL BE SEVEN FEET IN HEIGHT. (B) PARTITIONS SHALL REST DIRECTLY ON THE FLOOR. (C) PARTITIONS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH ELECTRICAL OUTLETS. (D) PARTITIONS SHALL EXTEND TO OUTSIDE WALLS. 2. (A) DRAPES OF SIGNIFICANT SOUND-DEADENING OR SOUND-ABSORBING QUALITY SHALL BE INSTALLED. (B) INDIVIDUAL SETS OF DRAPES, ABLE TO BE OPENED AND CLOSED INDEPENDENTLY OF OTHER DRAPES, SHALL BE INSTALLED IN EACH "CUBICLE" THAT HAS WINDOWS 3. A SOUND SYSTEM OF "WHITE NOISE" SHALL BE INSTALLED AND UTILIZED. 4. ACOUSTICAL CARPETING SHALL BE INSTALLED. 5. EACH EMPLOYEE SHALL BE SUPPLIED WITH A DESK LAMP. 6. SUCH MEETINGS FOR, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, CASE-MANAGEMENT INVENTORIES; EMPLOYEE COUNSELLING, EMPLOYEE DISCIPLINE, DESK AUDITS, SHALL TAKE PLACE ONLY IN THE EMPLOYEE'S SUPERVISOR'S OFFICE OR IN SOME OTHER CLOSED OFFICE OF CONFERENCE ROOM. THE PROPOSALS CONCERN THE IMPLEMENTATION BY THE AGENCY OF AN OPEN SPACE OFFICE DESIGN (WHICH DESIGN, ITSELF, IS NOT IN DISPUTE). THE AGENCY CLAIMS THE PROPOSALS WOULD INTERFERE WITH ITS RIGHT UNDER SECTION 7106(B)(1) OF THE STATUTE TO DETERMINE "THE TECHNOLOGY, METHODS, AND MEANS OF PERFORMING WORK." HOWEVER, THE AGENCY HAS NOT ESTABLISHED EITHER THAT THE PROPOSALS IN DISPUTE THEMSELVES WOULD HAVE ANY TECHNOLOGICAL RELATIONSHIP TO ACCOMPLISHING OR FURTHERING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE AGENCY'S WORK; OR THAT THEY WOULD INTERFERE WITH THE PURPOSE FOR WHICH AN OPEN SPACE OFFICE DESIGN WAS ADOPTED. IN THIS REGARD, THE INSTANT PROPOSALS BEAR NO MATERIAL DIFFERENCE FROM THOSE HELD TO BE NEGOTIABLE IN AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY, AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 2477 AND LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, WASHINGTON, D.C. (AND THE CASE CONSOLIDATED THEREWITH), 7 FLRA NO. 89(1982), AND ARE WITHIN THE DUTY TO BARGAIN FOR THE REASONS FULLY SET FORTH IN THAT CASE. UNION PROPOSAL 7 THE FIRST AND LAST FIFTEEN (15) MINUTES OF EACH WORKDAY ARE TO BE DEVOTED TO PACKING AND UNPACKING FILES. THIS TIME SHALL BE NON-CASE TIME AND THIS LOSS OF PRODUCTIVE TIME SHALL NOT BE USED TO DECREASE AN EMPLOYEE'S PERFORMANCE EVALUATION. THE PROPOSAL WOULD REQUIRE MANAGEMENT TO ASSIGN SPECIFIED TYPES OF WORK AT SPECIFIC TIMES TO BARGAINING UNIT EMPLOYEES AND WOULD PRECLUDE THE ASSIGNMENT OF OTHER WORK AT THOSE TIMES. THUS, IN AGREEMENT WITH THE AGENCY, THE AUTHORITY FINDS THE PROPOSAL VIOLATES MANAGEMENT'S RIGHT "TO ASSIGN WORK" UNDER SECTION 7106(A)(2)(B) OF THE STATUTE. SEE, E.G., AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE LOCALS AND DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE, 4 FLRA NO. 52(1980),AT 3 OF THE DECISION. ACCORDINGLY, PURSUANT TO SECTION 2424.10 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS (5 CFR 2424.10(1981), IT IS ORDERED THAT THE AGENCY SHALL UPON REQUEST (OR AS OTHERWISE AGREED TO BY THE PARTIES) BARGAIN ON UNION PROPOSALS 1-6. /1/ IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE PETITION FOR REVIEW WITH RESPECT TO UNION PROPOSAL 7 BE, AND IT HEREBY IS, DISMISSED. ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., MARCH 11, 1982 RONALD W. HAUGHTON, CHAIRMAN HENRY B. FRAZIER III, MEMBER LEON B. APPLEWHAITE, MEMBER FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY --------------- FOOTNOTES: --------------- /1/ IN DECIDING THAT THESE PROPOSALS ARE WITHIN THE DUTY TO BARGAIN, THE AUTHORITY, OF COURSE, MAKES NO JUDGMENT AS TO THEIR MERITS.