United States Customs Service (Respondent) and National Treasury Employees Union (Charging Party) and Office of Personnel Management (Intervenor)
[ v07 p453 ]
07:0453(68)CA
The decision of the Authority follows:
7 FLRA No. 68 UNITED STATES CUSTOMS SERVICE Respondent and NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION Charging Party and OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT Intervenor Case Nos. 3-CA-261 3-CA-1230 DECISION AND ORDER THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE AUTHORITY PURSUANT TO THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR'S "ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE AUTHORITY" IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 2429.1 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS (5 CFR 2429.1(A)). UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE ENTIRE RECORD IN THESE CASES, INCLUDING THE PARTIES' STIPULATION OF FACTS, ACCOMPANYING EXHIBITS AND BRIEFS SUBMITTED BY THE RESPONDENT, THE GENERAL COUNSEL AND THE INTERVENOR, THE AUTHORITY FINDS: THE COMPLAINTS HEREIN ALLEGE THAT THE RESPONDENT VIOLATED SECTION 7116(A)(1), (5) AND (8) OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE (THE STATUTE) ON JANUARY 11, 1979, AND CONTINUING THEREAFTER, BY REFUSING TO REIMBURSE EMPLOYEES SERVING AS UNION NEGOTIATORS FOR TRAVEL AND PER DIEM EXPENSES INCURRED ON OFFICIAL TIME IN REGARD TO COLLECTIVE BARGAINING NEGOTIATIONS ENGAGED IN BY THE PARTIES OVER A NATIONWIDE MASTER AGREEMENT. /1/ THE RESPONDENT ADMITS IT HAS REFUSED TO PAY TRAVEL AND PER DIEM EXPENSES TO EMPLOYEES SERVING AS UNION NEGOTIATORS, IN VIOLATION OF ESTABLISHED PRECEDENT. /2/ HOWEVER, THE RESPONDENT URGES THAT SUCH PRECEDENT BE REVERSED. THE RESPONDENT'S POSITION IS THAT THERE IS NO BASIS IN THE STATUTE, ITS LEGISLATIVE HISTORY, OR IN PRECEDENT ESTABLISHED UNDER EXECUTIVE ORDERS 10988 AND 11491 TO SUPPORT A DECISION THAT IT MUST PAY TRAVEL AND PER DIEM EXPENSES. THE RESPONDENT ARGUES THAT TO PAY SUCH MONIES WOULD BE IN VIOLATION OF LAW AND OF POLICY LIMITATIONS ON ITS APPROPRIATION. /3/ THE INTERVENOR ESSENTIALLY ARGUES IN SUPPORT OF THE RESPONDENT'S POSITION THAT THE AUTHORITY'S INTERPRETATION OF THE STATUTE IN INTERPRETATION AND GUIDANCE, SUPRA, WAS INCORRECT AND SHOULD BE REVERSED. THE PARTIES' STIPULATION REVEALS THAT THEY HAVE BEEN NEGOTIATING A NATIONWIDE MASTER AGREEMENT SINCE NOVEMBER OF 1978. SINCE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 11, 1979, THE EMPLOYEES OF THE RESPONDENT ACTING AS MEMBERS OF THE UNION NEGOTIATING TEAM HAVE BEEN GRANTED OFFICIAL TIME DURING THE TIME THEY WERE ENGAGED IN NEGOTIATING THE NATIONWIDE AGREEMENT. HOWEVER, THEY HAVE BEEN REFUSED PAYMENT FOR TRAVEL AND PER DIEM EXPENSES INCURRED DURING THE TIME PERIOD IN WHICH THEY WERE GRANTED OFFICIAL TIME. THE AUTHORITY HAS CONSIDERED THE RESPONDENT'S ARGUMENTS, ESSENTIALLY BASED ON THE RESPONDENT'S READING OF THE LEGISLATIVE HISTORY, THAT ESTABLISHED PRECEDENT (NOTE 2, SUPRA) BE REVERSED. HOWEVER, NO BASIS HAS BEEN ADVANCED TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE ESTABLISHED PRECEDENT IS INCORRECT, NOR HAS THE RESPONDENT RAISED ARGUMENTS NOT PREVIOUSLY CONSIDERED. THUS, THE AUTHORITY CONCLUDED IN THE INTERPRETATION AND GUIDANCE AND SUBSEQUENT CASES, BASED ON AN ANALYSIS OF THE STATUTE AND THE LEGISLATIVE HISTORY OF SECTION 7131, THAT ANY EMPLOYEE WHO IS ON OFFICIAL TIME UNDER SECTION 7131 WHILE REPRESENTING AN EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATIVE IN THE NEGOTIATION OF A COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT IS ENTITLED TO PAYMENT FROM AGENCIES FOR TRAVEL AND PER DIEM EXPENSES. THEREFORE, THE AUTHORITY FINDS THAT THE RESPONDENT VIOLATED SECTION 7116(A)(1) AND (8) WHEN IT DENIED PAYMENT OF PER DIEM AND TRAVEL EXPENSES TO EMPLOYEES ON OFFICIAL TIME UNDER SECTION 7131(A) OF THE STATUTE WHILE REPRESENTING AN EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATIVE IN THE NEGOTIATION OF A COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT. /4/ ORDER PURSUANT TO SECTION 2423.29 OF THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY AND SECTION 7118 OF THE STATUTE, THE AUTHORITY HEREBY ORDERS THAT THE UNITED STATES CUSTOMS SERVICE SHALL: 1. CEASE AND DESIST FROM: (A) FAILING AND REFUSING TO PROVIDE PAYMENT OF PROPERLY DOCUMENTED TRAVEL AND PER DIEM EXPENSES INCURRED BY ITS EMPLOYEES AS A RESULT OF THEIR PARTICIPATION ON OFFICIAL TIME UNDER SECTION 7131(A) OF THE STATUTE AS DULY DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES OF THE NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION, THE EMPLOYEES' EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATIVE, IN SCHEDULED NATIONWIDE MASTER AGREEMENT NEGOTIATIONS. (B) IN ANY LIKE OR RELATED MANNER INTERFERING WITH, RESTRAINING, OR COERCING ITS EMPLOYEES IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR RIGHTS ASSURED BY THE STATUTE. 2. TAKE THE FOLLOWING AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ORDER TO EFFECTUATE THE PURPOSES AND POLICIES OF THE STATUTE: (A) PROVIDE PAYMENT TO ANY OF ITS EMPLOYEES WHO SUBMIT A PROPERLY DOCUMENTED VOUCHER FOR TRAVEL AND PER DIEM EXPENSES INCURRED AS A RESULT OF PARTICIPATION ON OFFICIAL TIME UNDER SECTION 7131(A) OF THE STATUTE AS THE DULY DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION, THE EMPLOYEES' EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATIVE, IN THE NEGOTIATION OF THE PARTIES' NATIONWIDE MASTER AGREEMENT. (B) POST AT ITS FACILITIES NATIONWIDE COPIES OF THE ATTACHED NOTICE ON FORMS TO BE FURNISHED BY THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY. UPON RECEIPT OF SUCH FORMS, THEY SHALL BE SIGNED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND SHALL BE POSTED AND MAINTAINED BY HIM FOR 60 CONSECUTIVE DAYS THEREAFTER, IN CONSPICUOUS PLACES, INCLUDING ALL BULLETIN BOARDS AND OTHER PLACES WHERE NOTICES TO EMPLOYEES ARE CUSTOMARILY POSTED. THE COMMISSIONER SHALL TAKE REASONABLE STEPS TO INSURE THAT SAID NOTICES ARE NOT ALTERED, DEFACED, OR COVERED BY ANY OTHER MATERIAL. (C) PURSUANT TO SECTION 2423.30 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS, NOTIFY THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, REGION III, FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, IN WRITING, 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, AS TO WHAT STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO COMPLY HEREWITH. ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., DECEMBER 29, 1981 RONALD W. HAUGHTON, CHAIRMAN HENRY B. FRAZIER III, MEMBER LEON B. APPLEWHAITE, MEMBER FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY NOTICE TO ALL EMPLOYEES PURSUANT TO A DECISION AND ORDER OF THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY AND IN ORDER TO EFFECTUATE THE POLICIES OF CHAPTER 71 OF TITLE 5 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS WE HEREBY NOTIFY OUR EMPLOYEES THAT: WE WILL NOT FAIL OR REFUSE TO PROVIDE PAYMENT OF PROPERLY DOCUMENTED TRAVEL AND PER DIEM EXPENSES INCURRED BY OUR EMPLOYEES AS A RESULT OF THEIR PARTICIPATION ON OFFICIAL TIME UNDER SECTION 7131(A) OF THE STATUTE AS DULY DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES OF THE NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION, OUR EMPLOYEES' EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATIVE, IN SCHEDULED NEGOTIATIONS OVER THE NATIONWIDE MASTER AGREEMENT. WE WILL NOT IN ANY LIKE OR RELATED MANNER INTERFERE WITH, RESTRAIN, OR COERCE OUR EMPLOYEES IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR RIGHTS AS ASSURED BY THE STATUTE. WE WILL PROVIDE PAYMENT TO ANY OF OUR EMPLOYEES WHO SUBMIT A PROPERLY DOCUMENTED VOUCHER FOR TRAVEL AND PER DIEM EXPENSES INCURRED AS THE RESULT OF PARTICIPATION ON OFFICIAL TIME UNDER SECTION 7131(A) OF THE STATUTE AS THE DULY DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES OF THE NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION, THE EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATIVE OF OUR EMPLOYEES, IN THE NEGOTIATION OF THE NATIONWIDE MASTER AGREEMENT. (AGENCY OR ACTIVITY) DATED: BY: (SIGNATURE) (TITLE) THIS NOTICE MUST REMAIN POSTED FOR 60 CONSECUTIVE DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS POSTING AND MUST NOT BE ALTERED, DEFACED, OR COVERED BY ANY OTHER MATERIAL. IF EMPLOYEES HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING THIS NOTICE, OR COMPLIANCE WITH ITS PROVISIONS, THEY MAY COMMUNICATE DIRECTLY WITH THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, REGION III, WHOSE ADDRESS IS 1111 18TH STREET, NW., WASHINGTON, D.C., 20036 AND WHOSE TELEPHONE NUMBER IS (202) 653-8452. --------------- FOOTNOTES: --------------- /1/ THE COMPLAINTS ALLEGE ESSENTIALLY IDENTICAL CONDUCT. /2/ INTERPRETATION AND GUIDANCE, 2 FLRA 264(1979). SUBSEQUENTLY, THE AUTHORITY ISSUED BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO AND FIREARMS, WESTERN REGION, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, 4 FLRA NO. 40(1980), APPEAL DOCKETED, NO. 80-7673 (9TH CIR. NOV. 28, 1980) AND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, SCIENCE AND EDUCATION ADMINISTRATION, AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, NORTH CENTRAL REGION, DAKOTAS-ALASKA AREA, 6 FLRA NO. 45(1981), APPEAL DOCKETED, NO. 81-1948 (8TH CIR. SEPT. 4, 1981). SEE ALSO, FLORIDA NATIONAL GUARD, 5 FLRA NO. 49(1981), APPEAL DOCKETED, NO. 81-5466 (5TH CIR. MAY 18, 1981). /3/ THE RESPONDENT ALSO ARGUES THAT INTERPRETATION AND GUIDANCE, SUPRA, HAS NO FORCE AND EFFECT AS THE "ISSUANCE OF THE SUBJECT POLICY STATEMENT WAS AN ABUSE OF DISCRETION BY THE AUTHORITY . . . ." WITHOUT PASSING ON THE MERITS OF THIS ARGUMENT, THE AUTHORITY NOTES THAT THE ISSUE HAS BEEN DECIDED IN SUBSEQUENT UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE CASES (SEE NOT 2, SUPRA), THUS RENDERING THE ARGUMENT MOOT. /4/ BASED ON THE ABOVE OUTCOME, WHICH FULLY REMEDIES THE VIOLATION FOUND HEREIN, THE AUTHORITY FINDS IT UNNECESSARY TO DECIDE WHETHER SUCH CONDUCT ALSO VIOLATED SECTION 7116(A)(5).