[ v06 p699 ]
06:0699(120)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
6 FLRA No. 120 AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 1118 Union and DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, WASHINGTON, D.C. Activity Case No. O-NG-300 DECISION AND ORDER ON NEGOTIABILITY APPEAL THE PETITION FOR REVIEW IN THIS CASE COMES BEFORE THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY PURSUANT TO SECTION 7105(A)(2)(E) OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE (THE STATUTE). THE RECORD INDICATES THAT, ON AUGUST 13, 1979, THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET (OMB) ISSUED CIRCULAR NO. A-118, WHICH ESTABLISHED A GOVERNMENT-WIDE PAID PARKING PROGRAM FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES AND DIRECTED THE GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION (GSA) TO DEVELOP REGULATIONS FOR THIS PROGRAM. ON SEPTEMBER 6, 1979, GSA ISSUED FPMR TEMPORARY REGULATION D-65 (44 FED.REG. 53161), WHICH PRESCRIBED PROCEDURES FOR THE ASSIGNMENT OF PARKING SPACES AND THE ASSESSMENT OF FEES. THEREAFTER, PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING REGULATIONS, THE ACTIVITY PRESENTED THE UNION WITH A DRAFT DIRECTIVE REGARDING "PROCEDURES FOR THE ISSUANCE, FEES, COLLECTION AND USE OF EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMITS AT WASHINGTON NATIONAL AIRPORT." IN RESPONSE, THE UNION SUBMITTED A PROPOSAL WHICH PROVIDED, IN PART, THAT EMPLOYEE PARKING WILL BE BASED ON THE "RECOVERY FEE," I.E., THE ACTUAL COSTS INCURRED IN OPERATING THE PARKING FACILITY. /1/ THE ACTIVITY ALLEGED THAT THE PROPOSAL WAS NONNEGOTIABLE, ON THE GROUND THAT IT CONFLICTED WITH GOVERNMENT-WIDE REGULATIONS, SPECIFICALLY OMB CIRCULAR A-118 AND FPMR TEMPORARY REGULATION D-65. THE UNION FILED AN APPEAL WITH THE AUTHORITY UNDER SECTION 7117 OF THE STATUTE, AND THE AGENCY FILED A STATEMENT OF POSITION IN WHICH IT ESSENTIALLY REASSERTED THAT THE DISPUTED PROPOSAL WAS INCONSISTENT WITH OMB CIRCULAR A-118 AND FPMR TEMPORARY REGULATION D-65 AND HENCE WAS NONNEGOTIABLE. WHILE THIS APPEAL WAS PENDING BEFORE THE AUTHORITY, THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RULED THAT THE PAID PARKING PLAN, AS EMBODIED IN OMB CIRCULAR A-118, WAS INVALID AND THUS DID NOT CONVEY ANY AUTHORITY TO THE GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION (GSA) TO ISSUE A GSA REGULATION IMPOSING FEES FOR PREVIOUSLY FREE PARKING. SINCE THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ORDERED THAT THE GSA REGULATION BE SET ASIDE AND ITS ENFORCEMENT PERMANENTLY ENJOINED, /2/ GSA HAS REVISED THE REGULATION TO SUSPEND THE COLLECTION OF PARKING FEES AT THIS TIME IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INJUNCTION. /3/ INASMUCH AS THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT HAS DECLARED THE GSA PARKING FEE REGULATION IMPLEMENTING OMB CIRCULAR A-118 TO BE INVALID AND HAS PERMANENTLY ENJOINED ITS ENFORCEMENT, AND INASMUCH AS THE REGULATION IS NOT BEING EFFECTUATED AT THIS TIME IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INJUNCTION, IT IS CONCLUDED THAT THE NEGOTIABILITY ISSUE RAISED WITH RESPECT TO THE DISPUTED PROPOSAL INVOLVED IN THE INSTANT APPEAL HAS BEEN RENDERED MOOT. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED THAT THE UNION'S APPEAL BE DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO THE APPROPRIATE RENEWAL OF ITS CONTENTION THAT THE MATTER IN DISPUTE, AS PROPOSED TO BE NEGOTIATED, IS NEGOTIABLE UNDER THE STATUTE SHOULD THE INJUNCTION AGAINST THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE GSA PARKING FEE REGULATION SUBSEQUENTLY BE REMOVED. ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., SEPTEMBER 25, 1981 RONALD W. HAUGHTON, CHAIRMAN HENRY B. FRAZIER III, MEMBER LEON B. APPLEWHAITE, MEMBER FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY --------------- FOOTNOTES: --------------- /1/ THE UNION'S PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO THE ACTIVITY PROVIDED AS FOLLOWS: PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF OMB A118, THE FAIR VALUE OF EMPLOYEE PARKING WILL BE BASED ON THE RECOVERY FEE, AS IT HAS BEEN FOR THIS COMMERCIAL PARKING IN THE PAST. THE RATE FOR THE PERIOD NOVEMBER 1, 1979 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 1980 WILL BE $19.00. THIS IS CONSISTENT WITH FAA ORDER 5400.1A. /2/ THE AUTHORITY TAKES NOTE OF THE FACT THAT THE INJUNCTION ORDERED BY THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, ET AL. V. FREEMAN, 510 F.SUPP. 596 (D.D.C. 1981), IS CURRENTLY BEING APPEALED, APPEAL DOCKETED, NO. 81-1244 (D.C. CIR. APR. 24, 1981). IN THIS REGARD, GSA TWICE SOUGHT A STAY OF THE PERMANENT INJUNCTION PENDING THE APPEAL, FIRST WITH THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, WHICH MOTION WAS DENIED BY MEM ORDER IN CIV. NO. 79-2955 (D.D.C. MAR. 6, 1981) AND THEN WITH THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, WHICH MOTION WAS DENIED BY ORDER IN NO. 81-1244 (D.C. CIR. MAR. 13, 1981). /3/ 46 F.R. 40191(1981).