American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO (Union) and Air Force Logistics Command, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio (Activity)
[ v06 p458 ]
06:0458(81)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
6 FLRA No. 81 AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO (Union) and AIR FORCE LOGISTICS COMMAND, WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, OHIO (Activity) Case No. O-NG-518 ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR REVIEW THIS CASE IS BEFORE THE AUTHORITY PURSUANT TO SECTION 7105(A)(2)(E) OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE (5 U.S.C. 7101 ET SEQ.) ON A PETITION FOR REVIEW OF A NEGOTIABILITY ISSUE FILED BY THE UNION. THE RECORD IN THIS CASE INDICATES THAT DURING NEGOTIATIONS BETWEEN THE ACTIVITY AND THE UNION, THE ACTIVITY ALLEGED THAT IT LACKED DISCRETION TO NEGOTIATE ON A UNION PROPOSAL CONCERNING THE MERIT PROMOTION PROCESS BECAUSE THE PROPOSAL CONFLICTED WITH AN AIR FORCE REGULATION AND, IN EFFECT, THAT THE DUTY TO BARGAIN THEREFORE DID NOT EXTEND TO THE PROPOSAL. THE UNION THEN FILED THE INSTANT APPEAL WITH THE AUTHORITY, SEEKING A DETERMINATION, PURSUANT TO SECTION 7117(B) OF THE STATUTE AND SECTION 2424.1(B)(3) OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES OF PROCEDURE (5 CFR 2424.1(B)(3) (1981)), AS TO WHETHER A COMPELLING NEED EXISTS FOR THE AGENCY REGULATION IN QUESTION. SUBSEQUENTLY, IN ITS STATEMENT FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 2424.6 OF THE RULES (5 CFR 2424.6(1981)), THE AGENCY WITHDREW THE ACTIVITY'S ALLEGATION OF NONNEGOTIABILITY. SINCE THE AGENCY HAS WITHDRAWN THE ALLEGATION CONCERNING THE UNION'S PROPOSAL, THERE IS NO LONGER AN ISSUE AS TO WHETHER THE PROPOSAL IN THIS CASE IS WITHIN THE PARTIES' DUTY TO BARGAIN UNDER THE STATUTE. THE DISPUTE INVOLVED IN THE UNION'S APPEAL THEREFORE HAS BEEN RENDERED MOOT. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE UNION'S PETITION FOR REVIEW HEREIN BE, AND IT HEREBY IS, DISMISSED. FOR THE AUTHORITY. ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., AUGUST 26, 1981 JAMES J. SHEPARD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR