[ v06 p348 ]
06:0348(62)AR
The decision of the Authority follows:
6 FLRA No. 62 AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES (AFL-CIO) LOCAL 1770 Union and HEADQUARTERS XVIII AIRBORNE CORPS AND FORT BRAGG, FORT BRAGG, N.C. Activity Case No. O-AR-162 DECISION THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE AUTHORITY ON AN EXCEPTION TO THE AWARD OF ARBITRATOR J. RALPH BEAIRD FILED BY THE UNION UNDER SECTION 7122(A) OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE (5 U.S.C. 7122(A)). ACCORDING TO THE ARBITRATOR, THIS MATTER INVOLVED A DISPUTE BETWEEN THE ACTIVITY AND THE UNION AS TO WHETHER THE GRIEVANT WAS ENTITLED, UNDER THE PARTIES' COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT, TO HAVE THE OPTION OF TAKING LEAVE WITHOUT PAY RATHER THAN ANNUAL LEAVE TO ATTEND A UNION MEETING. UNABLE TO RESOLVE THE DISPUTE, THE PARTIES SUBMITTED THE FOLLOWING ISSUE TO ARBITRATION: DID (THE ACTIVITY) VIOLATE THE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT WHEN IT DENIED GRIEVANT'S OCTOBER 29, 1979 REQUEST FOR LEAVE WITHOUT PAY? THE CONTRACT PROVISION INVOKED BY THE GRIEVANT AND BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR WAS ARTICLE XVII, SECTION 2 WHICH PROVIDES: SECTION 2. THE UNION MAY DESIGNATE EMPLOYEE MEMBERS AS ELECTED OR APPOINTED REPRESENTATIVES TO A UNION ACTIVITY NECESSITATING A LEAVE OF ABSENCE. UPON WRITTEN NOTIFICATION TO THE EMPLOYER BY THE UNION, SUCH EMPLOYEES MAY BE GRANTED ANNUAL LEAVE OR LEAVE WITHOUT PAY PROVIDED HE CAN BE SPARED WITHOUT UNDUE INTERRUPTION TO THE OPERATION OF THE ORGANIZATIONAL ELEMENT IN WHICH HE IS EMPLOYED. THE ARBITRATOR FOUND THAT "(T)HE LANGUAGE OF THIS PROVISION IS CLEAR" AND THEREFORE, DUE TO ITS "DISCRETIONARY CHARACTER," THE GRIEVANT "WAS NOT ENTITLED, OF RIGHT, TO HIS REQUEST FOR LEAVE WITHOUT PAY ON OCTOBER 29, 1979." THEREFORE, THE ARBITRATOR DENIED THE GRIEVANCE. THE UNION FILED AN EXCEPTION TO THE ARBITRATOR'S AWARD UNDER SECTION 7122(A) OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE /1/ AND PART 2425 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS, 5 CFR PART 2425. THE AGENCY FILED AN OPPOSITION. IN ITS EXCEPTION THE UNION CONTENDS THAT THE ARBITRATOR'S AWARD IS CONTRARY TO THE FEDERAL PERSONNEL MANUAL (FPM). IN SUPPORT OF THIS EXCEPTION THE UNION ASSERTS THAT THE FPM PROVIDES AN EXAMPLE OF A SITUATION, SIMILAR TO THE FACTS IN THIS CASE, IN WHICH IT IS PROPER TO APPROVE LEAVE WITHOUT PAY. FURTHER, THE UNION ARGUES THAT THE OPTION OF UNION REPRESENTATIVES TO USE EITHER ANNUAL LEAVE OR LEAVE WITHOUT PAY "HA(D) NEVER BEEN QUESTIONED BY MANAGEMENT" BEFORE THE GRIEVANCE IN THIS CASE AND THAT THE ARBITRATOR FAILED TO CONSIDER RELEVANT FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY DECISIONS. /2/ THE AUTHORITY FINDS THAT THE UNION HAS FAILED TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE ARBITRATOR'S AWARD, FINDING THAT GRANTING LEAVE WITHOUT PAY UNDER THE AGREEMENT WAS DISCRETIONARY WITH THE ACTIVITY, IS CONTRARY TO THE FPM. THUS THE UNION HAS NOT DEMONSTRATED HOW THE FEDERAL PERSONNEL MANUAL OR THE CITED AUTHORITY DECISIONS ARE IN ANY MANNER RELEVANT TO THE ARBITRATOR'S AWARD IN THIS CASE. THE SOLE QUESTION PLACED BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR, AND ADDRESSED BY HIM, INVOLVED A DISPUTE AS TO HOW A CERTAIN PROVISION OF THE PARTIES' COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT SHOULD BE INTERPRETED. THE UNION'S EXCEPTION CONSTITUTES DISAGREEMENT WITH THE ARBITRATOR'S INTERPRETATION OF THAT PROVISION OF THE AGREEMENT, WHICH DOES NOT PROVIDE A BASIS FOR FINDING AN AWARD DEFICIENT. RED RIVER ARMY DEPOT AND NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, LOCAL R14-52, 3 FLRA NO. 32(1980). ACCORDINGLY, THE UNION'S EXCEPTION PROVIDES NO BASIS FOR FINDING THE AWARD DEFICIENT UNDER 5 U.S.C. 7122(A) AND SECTION 2425.3 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS. FOR THE FOREGOING REASONS AND PURSUANT TO SECTION 2425.4 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS, WE HEREBY SUSTAIN THE ARBITRATOR'S AWARD. ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., JULY 30, 1981 RONALD W. HAUGHTON, CHAIRMAN HENRY B. FRAZIER, III, MEMBER LEON B. APPLEWHAITE, MEMBER FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY --------------- FOOTNOTES: --------------- /1/ 5 U.S.C. 7122(A) PROVIDES: (A) EITHER PARTY TO ARBITRATION UNDER THIS CHAPTER MAY FILE WITH THE AUTHORITY AN EXCEPTION TO ANY ARBITRATOR'S AWARD PURSUANT TO THE ARBITRATION (OTHER THAN AN AWARD RELATING TO A MATTER DESCRIBED IN SECTION 7121(F) OF THIS TITLE). IF UPON REVIEW THE AUTHORITY FINDS THAT THE AWARD IS DEFICIENT-- (1) BECAUSE IT IS CONTRARY TO ANY LAW, RULE, OR REGULATION; OR (2) ON OTHER GROUNDS SIMILAR TO THOSE APPLIED BY FEDERAL COURTS IN PRIVATE SECTOR LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS; THE AUTHORITY MAY TAKE SUCH ACTION AND MAKE SUCH RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING THE AWARD AS IT CONSIDERS NECESSARY, CONSISTENT WITH APPLICABLE LAWS, RULES, OR REGULATIONS. /2/ THE UNION CITES GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, REGION 9, FEDERAL PROTECTIVE SERVICE DIVISION, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA AND INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF FEDERAL POLICE, LOCAL 41, 3 FLRA NO. 22(1980), AND DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, NAVAL UNDERWATER SYSTEMS CENTER, NEWPORT NAVAL BASE AND FEDERAL UNION OF SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, LOCAL R1-144, 3 FLRA NO. 64(1980).