[ v06 p39 ]
06:0039(12)AR
The decision of the Authority follows:
6 FLRA No. 12 U.S. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE Agency and AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, NATIONAL IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE COUNCIL Union Case No. O-AR-165 ORDER DISMISSING EXCEPTION THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE AUTHORITY ON AN EXCEPTION TO THE AWARD OF ARBITRATOR BARNETT M. GOODSTEIN FILED BY THE AGENCY UNDER SECTION 7122(A) OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE (5 U.S.C. 7122(A)). FOR THE REASONS THAT FOLLOW, THE AUTHORITY IS WITHOUT JURISDICTION TO REVIEW THE AGENCY'S EXCEPTION AND ACCORDINGLY IT MUST BE DISMISSED. SECTION 7122(A) OF THE STATUTE PROVIDES IN PERTINENT PART: EITHER PARTY TO ARBITRATION UNDER THIS CHAPTER MAY FILE WITH THE AUTHORITY AN EXCEPTION TO ANY ARBITRATOR'S AWARD PURSUANT TO THE ARBITRATION (OTHER THAN AN AWARD RELATING TO A MATTER DESCRIBED IN SECTION 7121(F) OF THIS TITLE). AS RELEVANT TO THIS CASE, THE MATTERS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 7121(F) OF THE STATUTE INCLUDE THOSE COVERED UNDER 5 U.S.C. 7512 WHICH, IN TURN, SETS FORTH SPECIFIED ADVERSE ACTIONS INCLUDING SUSPENSIONS FOR MORE THAN 14 DAYS. PURSUANT TO SECTION 7121(F), REVIEW OF AN ARBITRATION AWARD RELATING TO SUCH MATTERS MAY BE OBTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 5 U.S.C. 7703 WHICH PROVIDES FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF FINAL DECISIONS OF THE MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD AND UNDER SECTION 7121(F) APPLIES TO THE AWARD OF AN ARBITRATOR AS IF THE MATTER HAD BEEN DECIDED BY THAT BOARD. THE GRIEVANCE SUBMITTED TO ARBITRATION IN THIS CASE CONCERNED THE GRIEVANT'S SUSPENSION FOR 15 DAYS FOR REFUSING TO MAKE A WRITTEN REPORT OF A CERTAIN INCIDENT WITHOUT WRITTEN ASSURANCE THAT THE REPORT WOULD NOT BE THE BASIS OF DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST HIM. NOTING IN GENERAL THAT UNDER THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION PERSONS MAY NOT BE REQUIRED TO TESTIFY AGAINST THEMSELVES, THE ARBITRATOR RULED THAT THE AGENCY COULD NOT ORDER THE GRIEVANT TO MAKE SUCH A REPORT. ACCORDINGLY, AS HIS AWARD, THE ARBITRATOR FOUND NO JUST CAUSE FOR THE GRIEVANT'S SUSPENSION. IN ITS EXCEPTION TO THE AWARD, THE AGENCY ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE GRIEVANCE WHICH GAVE RISE TO THE ARBITRATION PERTAINS TO A MATTER COVERED BY 5 U.S.C. 7512. NEVERTHELESS, THE AGENCY POINTS TO THE ARBITRATOR'S REFERENCE TO THE CONSTITUTION AND ASSERTS THAT IN MAKING SUCH A REFERENCE THE ARBITRATOR WAS PASSING ON THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF AN AGENCY ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION. THE AGENCY MAINTAINS THAT IN DOING SO THE ARBITRATOR EXCEEDED HIS AUTHORITY. THUS, THE AGENCY CHARACTERIZES THE QUESTION BEFORE THE AUTHORITY AS ONE OF "ARBITRABILITY," SPECIFICALLY, THE ARBITRATOR'S JURISDICTION TO PASS ON THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF AN AGENCY ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION. THE AGENCY ACCORDINGLY CONTENDS THAT THE APPEAL IS PROPERLY BEFORE THE AUTHORITY AND REQUESTS THAT THE AUTHORITY VACATE THE AWARD. CONTRARY TO THE AGENCY'S CONTENTION, THE AUTHORITY FINDS NO STATUTORY BASIS ON WHICH TO REVIEW THE AWARD. WITHOUT DECIDING IF COLLATERAL ISSUES ADDRESSED BY AN ARBITRATOR IN RESOLVING A MATTER DESCRIBED IN SECTION 7121(F) OF THE STATUTE MAY BE PROPERLY SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY THE AUTHORITY UNDER SECTION 7122(A), IT IS CLEAR IN THIS CASE THAT THE AGENCY'S CHALLENGE TO THE ARBITRATOR'S AWARD PERTAINS TO THE ARBITRATOR'S RESOLUTION OF THE MERITS OF THE GRIEVANCE. ALTHOUGH CHARACTERIZING ITS APPEAL AS A CHALLENGE TO THE ARBITRATOR'S "JURISDICTION," THE AGENCY'S EXCEPTION DIRECTLY CONCERNS THE PROPRIETY OF THE ARBITRATOR'S DETERMINATION OF THE MERITS OF THE GRIEVANCE AND, AS RELIEF, ESSENTIALLY REQUESTS THAT THE AUTHORITY VACATE THAT DETERMINATION. THUS, BOTH THE AWARD AND THE AGENCY'S EXCEPTION TO IT "RELAT(E) TO A MATTER DESCRIBED IN SECTION 7121(F). . . . " CONSEQUENTLY, THE AUTHORITY HAS NO BASIS ON WHICH TO REVIEW THE ARBITRATOR'S AWARD. ACCORDINGLY, AND APART FROM OTHER CONSIDERATIONS, THE AGENCY'S EXCEPTION IS ORDERED DISMISSED. ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., JUNE 10, 1981 RONALD W. HAUGHTON, CHAIRMAN HENRY B. FRAZIER III, MEMBER LEON B. APPLEWHAITE, MEMBER FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY