[ v05 p95 ]
05:0095(18)AR
The decision of the Authority follows:
5 FLRA No. 18 GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION (Activity) and AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, LOCAL NO. 1733 (Union) Case No. 0-AR-174 ORDER DISMISSING EXCEPTIONS ON DECEMBER 14, 1980, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1733 (THE UNION) FILED EXCEPTIONS TO THE AWARD OF ARBITRATOR ROBERT B. LUBIC IN THE INSTANT CASE WITH THE AUTHORITY, PURSUANT TO SECTION 2425.1 OF THE AUTHORITY'S REGULATIONS (5 C.F.R. 2425.1(1980)). FOR THE REASONS INDICATED BELOW, IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT THE SUBJECT EXCEPTIONS WERE UNTIMELY FILED AND CANNOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. SECTION 2425.1(B) OF THE AUTHORITY'S REGULATIONS (5 C.F.R. 2425.1(B)(1980)) PROVIDES: THE TIME LIMIT FOR FILING AN EXCEPTION TO AN ARBITRATION AWARD IS THIRTY (30) DAYS BEGINNING ON THE DATE OF THE AWARD. THE SUBJECT ARBITRATION AWARD, AS INCLUDED IN THE UNION'S SUBMISSION, IS DATED NOVEMBER 11, 1980. THEREFORE, UNDER SECTION 2425.1(B) OF THE AUTHORITY'S REGULATIONS, THE UNION'S EXCEPTIONS WERE DUE IN THE OFFICE OF THE AUTHORITY NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 10, 1980. /1/ HOWEVER, AS STATED ABOVE, THE SUBJECT EXCEPTIONS WERE NOT FILED WITH THE AUTHORITY UNTIL DECEMBER 14, 1980. IN THIS REGARD, THE AUTHORITY IS NOT EMPOWERED TO EXTEND OR WAIVE THE TIME LIMIT FOR FILING EXCEPTIONS TO ARBITRATOR'S AWARDS. ACCORDINGLY, AS THE UNION'S EXCEPTIONS WERE UNTIMELY FILED, AND APART FROM OTHER CONSIDERATIONS, THE UNION'S APPEAL IS HEREBY DISMISSED. FOR THE AUTHORITY. ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., FEBRUARY 10, 1981 JAMES J. SHEPARD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR --------------- FOOTNOTES$ --------------- /1/ IN THIS REGARD, THE UNION APPEARS TO ARGUE THAT THE TIME LIMIT FOR FILING ITS EXCEPTIONS SHOULD RUN FROM NOVEMBER 25, 1980, WHEN THE ARBITRATOR IN ESSENCE DECLINED THE UNION'S REQUEST FOR A CLARIFICATION AND INTERPRETATION OF THE AWARD. HOWEVER, UNDER SECTION 2425.1(B) OF THE AUTHORITY'S REGULATIONS, SET FORTH IN FULL ABOVE, THE TIME LIMIT FOR FILING EXCEPTIONS RUNS FROM THE DATE OF THE AWARD ITSELF. ACCORDINGLY, THE UNION'S CONTENTIONS PERTAINING TO THE COMPUTATION OF THE TIME PERIOD FOR FILING EXCEPTIONS IN THIS CASE ARE WITHOUT MERIT.