National Treasury Employees Union, Chapter 208 (Union) and Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC (Agency)
[ v04 p215 ]
04:0215(31)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
4 FLRA No. 31 NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION, CHAPTER 208 Union and NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, D.C. Agency Case No. O-MC-5 ORDER DISMISSING PETITION IN A PETITION FILED WITH THE AUTHORITY, CHAPTER 208, NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION (THE UNION) SEEKS REVIEW OF AN ISSUE THAT AROSE IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROCESSING OF A GRIEVANCE UNDER A NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNION AND THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (THE AGENCY). BASED UPON THE UNION'S SUBMISSION, IT APPEARS THAT THE AGENCY DENIED A GRIEVANCE (RELATED TO A LIFE INSURANCE COVERAGE AND PREMIUM PAYMENT DISPUTE) AT THE FIRST STEP OF THE PARTIES' NEGOTIATED GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE ON THE GROUND THAT THE MATTER WAS NONGRIEVABLE, BECAUSE IT WAS SPECIFICALLY EXCLUDED FROM GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE COVERAGE BY SECTION 7121(C)(2) OF THE STATUTE. /1/ ON APPEAL AT THE SECOND STEP OF THE GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE, IT FURTHER APPEARS THAT THE AGENCY ADVISED THE UNION THAT SINCE THE DETERMINATION THAT THE MATTER WAS NONGRIEVABLE WAS BASED ON THE AGENCY'S VIEW THAT IT WAS NONNEGOTIABLE, THE UNION'S RECOURSE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION G(1) OF THE PARTIES' AGREEMENT, /2/ WAS NOT TO THE SECOND LEVEL OFFICIAL, BUT RATHER, TO THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY. THE UNION THEREUPON FILED THE INSTANT PETITION WITH THE AUTHORITY. SECTION 2424.1 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES OF PROCEDURE (5 C.F.R. 2424.1(1980)), GOVERNING REVIEW OF NEGOTIABILITY ISSUES, PROVIDES THAT THE AUTHORITY WILL CONSIDER A NEGOTIABILITY ISSUE UNDER THE CONDITIONS PRESCRIBED THEREIN (AS RELEVANT HERE, IF AN AGENCY INVOLVED IN COLLECTIVE BARGAINING WITH AN EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATIVE ALLEGES THAT THE DUTY TO BARGAIN IN GOOD FAITH DOES NOT EXTEND TO ANY MATTER PROPOSED TO BE BARGAINED). THE CIRCUMSTANCES DESCRIBED IN THE UNION'S PETITION DO NOT GIVE RISE TO A NEGOTIABILITY ISSUE WHICH THE AUTHORITY MAY PROPERLY REVIEW UNDER SECTION 2424.1 OF ITS RULES OF PROCEDURE. THAT IS, THE PARTIES WERE NOT INVOLVED IN COLLECTIVE BARGAINING WHEN THE INSTANT DISPUTE AROSE; THE UNION DID NOT PROPOSE THAT A PARTICULAR MATTER BE BARGAINED; NOR DID THE AGENCY ALLEGE THAT ITS DUTY TO BARGAIN DID NOT EXTEND TO SUCH MATTER. RATHER, AS ALREADY INDICATED, THE DISPUTE AROSE DURING THE PROCESSING OF A GRIEVANCE, AND CONCERNED THE GRIEVABILITY OF THE MATTER INVOLVED. MOREOVER, UNDER SECTION 7121 OF THE STATUTE, GRIEVABILITY/ARBITRABILITY QUESTIONS WHICH ARE NOT SATISFACTORILY RESOLVED BY THE PARTIES UNDER NEGOTIATED GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES ARE SUBJECT TO BINDING ARBITRATION. DETERMINATIONS BY AN ARBITRATOR ON SUCH QUESTIONS ARE, OF COURSE, SUBJECT TO AUTHORITY REVIEW UPON THE FILING OF EXCEPTIONS BY A PARTY TO THE PROCEEDING, PURSUANT TO SECTION 7122 OF THE STATUTE AND PART 2425 OF THE AUTHORITY'S REGULATIONS (5 C.F.R.PART 2425(1980)). FURTHER, REGARDING SECTION G(1) OF THE PARTIES' AGREEMENT PROVIDING THAT THE UNION MAY APPEAL AGENCY DETERMINATIONS OF NONNEGOTIABILITY TO THE AUTHORITY, SUCH IS WITHOUT ANY CONTROLLING EFFECT. THE JURISDICTION OF THE AUTHORITY TO REVIEW NEGOTIABILITY ISSUES IS ESTABLISHED BY THE STATUTE. THE EXERCISE OF THAT JURISDICTION, AS PROVIDED IN PART 2424 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES OF PROCEDURE, CANNOT IN ANY WAY BE EXPANDED BY AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARTIES TO A COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT. THEREFORE, THE CONTRACT PROVISION INVOLVED HERE IS WITHOUT FORCE OR EFFECT AS TO THE AUTHORITY. ACCORDINGLY, SINCE THE UNION'S PETITION FAILS TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW UNDER SECTION 2424.1 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES OF PROCEDURE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE UNION'S PETITION BE, AND IT HEREBY IS, DISMISSED. FOR THE AUTHORITY. ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., SEPTEMBER 12, 1980 SAMUEL A. CHAITOVITZ, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR --------------- FOOTNOTES$ --------------- /1/ 5 U.S.C. 7121(C)(2)(SUPP. II 1978). SECTION 7121(C) OF THE STATUTE PROVIDES, IN PERTINENT PART: THE PRECEDING SUBSECTIONS OF THIS SECTION SHALL NOT APPLY WITH RESPECT TO ANY GRIEVANCE CONCERNING . . . (2) RETIREMENT, LIFE INSURANCE, OR HEALTH INSURANCE . . . /2/ SECTION G(1) OF THE PARTIES' AGREEMENT PROVIDES, IN PART: MANAGEMENT MAY ASSERT THAT A MATTER IS NON-GRIEVABLE OR NON-ARBITRABLE BECAUSE IT IS NON-NEGOTIABLE AT ANY STEP OF THE GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE. THE UNION MAY APPEAL THE DETERMINATION OF NON-NEGOTIABILITY TO THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY . . .