[ v02 p428 ]
02:0428(59)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
2 FLRA No. 59 AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO LOCAL 331 (Union) and VETERANS ADMINISTRATION HOSPITAL, PERRY POINT, MARYLAND (Activity) Case No. 0-NG-17 DECISION THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE AUTHORITY ON A REQUEST BY THE VETERANS ADMINISTRATION THAT THE AUTHORITY CLARIFY ITS DECISION IN THE ABOVE-ENTITLED CASE. IN ITS DECISION OF JANUARY 17, 1980, IN THE ABOVE-ENTITLED CASE, THE AUTHORITY FOUND NEGOTIABLE UNDER THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE (THE STATUTE) THE FOLLOWING UNION PROPOSAL: ARTICLE 25, PROMOTION, SECTION A-- IT IS AGREED THAT AN EMPLOYER WILL UTILIZE, TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE THE SKILLS, AND TALENTS OF ITS EMPLOYEES. THEREFORE, CONSIDERATION WILL BE GIVEN IN FILLING VACANT POSITIONS, TO EMPLOYEES WITHIN THE BARGAINING UNIT. MANAGEMENT WILL NOT SOLICIT APPLICATIONS FROM OUTSIDE THE MINIMUM AREA OF CONSIDERATION OR CALL FOR A CIVIL SERVICE REGISTER OF CANDIDATES IF THREE OR MORE HIGHLY QUALIFIED CANDIDATES CAN BE IDENTIFIED WITHIN THE MINIMUM AREA OF CONSIDERATION. THIS WILL NOT PREVENT APPLICANTS FROM OTHER VA FIELD UNITS APPLYING PROVIDED THEY SPECIFICALLY APPLY FOR THE VACANCY BEING FILLED AND THAT THEY ARE RANKED AND RATED WITH THE SAME MERIT PROMOTION PANEL AS LOCAL EMPLOYEES. CITING THE RELEVANT LEGISLATIVE HISTORY OF SECTION 7106(A)(2)(C) OF THE STATUTE, THE AUTHORITY FOUND THAT THE UNIONS PROPOSAL WOULD NOT PREVENT MANAGEMENT FROM EXERCISING ITS RESERVED RIGHT, IN FILLING POSITIONS, TO SELECT FROM AMONG PROPERLY RANKED AND CERTIFIED CANDIDATES FOR PROMOTION OR FROM ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE SOURCE. RATHER, THE AUTHORITY CONCLUDED THAT THE PROPOSAL WOULD REQUIRE ONLY THAT CONSIDERATION BE GIVEN TO EMPLOYEES WITHIN THE BARGAINING UNIT IN FILLING VACANT POSITIONS BUT WOULD NOT PREVENT MANAGEMENT FROM CONSIDERING OTHER APPLICANTS, OR EXPANDING THE AREA OF CONSIDERATION ONCE BARGAINING UNIT EMPLOYEES WERE CONSIDERED, OR USING ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE SOURCE IN FILLING SUCH VACANCIES, AND THEREFORE DID NOT PREVENT MANAGEMENT FROM EXERCISING ITS RESERVED RIGHT TO SELECT. SEE ALSO, THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF CSA LOCALS, A.F.G.E., AFL-CIO AND THE COMMUNITY SERVICE ADMINISTRATION, CASE NO. O-NG-127, 3 FLRA NO. 13 (APRIL 28, 1980), ASSOCIATION OF CIVILIAN TECHNICIANS, DELAWARE CHAPTER AND NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU, DELAWARE NATIONAL GUARD, CASE NO. O-NG-104, 3 FLRA NO. 9 (APRIL 14, 1980), AND NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1451 AND NAVY EXCHANGE, NAVAL ADMINISTRATION COMMAND, ORLANDO, FLORIDA, CASE NO. O-NG-160, 3 FLRA NO. 60 (JUNE 11, 1980), IN WHICH THE AUTHORITY FURTHER DISCUSSED THAT DECISION IN THE CONTEXT OF RELATED PROPOSALS. UNDER THESE CIRCUMSTANCES, NOTING PARTICULARLY THE AUTHORITY'S DECISIONS IN THE ABOVE-CITED CASES, THE AUTHORITY FINDS THAT FURTHER CLARIFICATION OF THE SUBJECT DECISION IS NOT INDICATED. ACCORDINGLY, THE AGENCY'S REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION IS DENIED. ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., JUNE 30, 1980 RONALD W. HAUGHTON, CHAIRMAN HENRY B. FRAZIER III, MEMBER LEON B. APPLEWHAITE, MEMBER FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY